Teen Faces Porn Charges for Nude MySpace Pictures, Another one bites the dust! |
Teen Faces Porn Charges for Nude MySpace Pictures, Another one bites the dust! |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 6,349 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 455,274 ![]() |
QUOTE A 14 year old New Jersey girl has been accused of child pornography after posting over 30 explicit nude pictures of herself on MySpace.com, charges that could force her to register as a sex offender if convicted. Video: http://webcastr.com/videos/underground/tee...e-pictures.html You'd think that children would just learn their lessons by now. Oh by the way, I'm one of those people on Myspace who actually does report people for nudity of any form. ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
*paperplane* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
Technically it is the age of consent. Look up any porn industry.. you must be 18 or older to even show or fondle any private parts. Otherwise it's "child" pornography. Oh you God damn right parents have the right to do whatever the f*ck they want as long as it's within the boundaries of the law and morality. You have the wrong idea about parenthood and childhood, my dear. Get that progressive mentality out of your system. As if anything gets accomplished through regression. Or as if anyone's childhood is meant to be tainted by the stupid mistake of misusing her own body. Kids most definitely need to be discouraged from sharing nude pictures of themselves, but I do not believe that charging them as sex offenders could possibly be the right way to go about that. Children's bodies are not the property of their parents. The parents are responsible for them, guardians, but that is not the same as ownership. Minors don't have full rights, but they damn well have more than you seem to think. That's not the age of consent. She would not have to be 18 to expose herself to her boyfriend, because she would not have to be 18 to have sex with her boyfriend. I've already linked you to a page of age of consent laws before. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 6,349 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 455,274 ![]() |
Children's bodies are not the property of their parents. The parents are responsible for them, guardians, but that is not the same as ownership. Minors don't have full rights, but they damn well have more than you seem to think. You white, ain't it? Us Hispanics, Italians, hell even Arabs and Persians would slap their child in the mouth if they ever said, "I'm not your property". Yes and you're right, it's pretty damn sad that our children who couldn't even survive without their parents/guardians actually even have ANY rights to begin with. QUOTE That's not the age of consent. She would not have to be 18 to expose herself to her boyfriend, because she would not have to be 18 to have sex with her boyfriend. I've already linked you to a page of age of consent laws before. It's the age of consent by law in regards to nudity, specifically used in a pornographic manner. This isn't about sex, this is about a no self respecting, low self esteem having, underage child who sluts around by posting her nude pictures on a community website just for her horny boyfriend. You're going to have to accept the fact that if you're under the age of 18 years old, the age of an adult, and you take nude pictures just to pass them around or even get caught with those nude pictures, that will automatically be held against you in the court of law as evidence for child pornography. Conservatism is strongly needed... America is becoming another country full of atheistic, hedonistic, progressives, who are killing this country. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |