redundancy |
redundancy |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,454 Joined: Nov 2008 Member No: 696,018 ![]() |
i might be a hypocrite for hating when people are redundant since i'm sure i'm also guilty of this... but anyways.
i get ticked off when people say things like "it's stinky, smelly, and hairy" or "keep it short and concise." stinky and smelly mean the same things, so why use both? and "short" is already implied in the definition of "concise" so why can't you just say "keep it concise." it's not a big deal, really. just bugs me -_- |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 5,880 Joined: Nov 2007 Member No: 593,382 ![]() |
It gives a better visual picture, unless someone is saying it then it goes farther into depth of what there sense are feeling.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,454 Joined: Nov 2008 Member No: 696,018 ![]() |
It gives a better visual picture, unless someone is saying it then it goes farther into depth of what there sense are feeling. uh... repeating shit doesn't give a better visual picture. it just drives home the point, which is why repetition can be okay depending on circumstance. giving a better visual would be like... "it's smelly and hairy and dimply and gross." not "it's smelly and stinky and dude it stank." |
|
|
![]() ![]() |