Member reputation status, Implement it! |
Member reputation status, Implement it! |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() monster hunter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 1,203 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 18,188 ![]() |
Add a member reputation system so everyone can just negative rep a person instead of bashing. It'd relieve a lot of your problems too. Less bashing, less to moderate. It's a load off your shoulders.
Plus, it's an outlet for the people who are annoyed at said member. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Live long and prosper. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 10,142 Joined: Apr 2007 Member No: 514,926 ![]() |
There are two pitfalls to the member rating system, one, it could get abused, where you have one member, just cause they're not well-liked everything that they say, could be rating negatively, even if it's in good advice. While the other side, if a person gives great comments/help/advice they could have a very high rating, they could say the wrong thing in a help thread for example, and the OP may ignore everyone else cause this one person has the highest rating, and could have wasted their time cause the person with the high rating was wrong. That's just my view on this. I like where we're at now, with no tests of a person's legitimacy to post.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 5,166 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 585,858 ![]() |
There are two pitfalls to the member rating system, one, it could get abused, where you have one member, just cause they're not well-liked everything that they say, could be rating negatively, even if it's in good advice. While the other side, if a person gives great comments/help/advice they could have a very high rating, they could say the wrong thing in a help thread for example, and the OP may ignore everyone else cause this one person has the highest rating, and could have wasted their time cause the person with the high rating was wrong. That's just my view on this. I like where we're at now, with no tests of a person's legitimacy to post. that why you let only ADMIN rep.. all ppl start 0 green bar.. and then they move up one one one when they get 5 green bar.. that meen dey got good post r sum shiet.. cuz i aint gonna say let memba staff..MOTM..DESIGNER shiet da rep.. cuz then you got buddy n shiet repp eech otha.. but i no admin buddy withh sum memba staff 2.. so gonna b hard.. admin n other designer motm can rep only they put down WHY they rep... i dunno bout let member rep... that when u get ABUSE..PUT DOWN WHY U REP.. N MEMBER CAN REED WHAT YOU SAY WHEN THEY CLIK AT THE REP BAR.. this rep shiet work.. but i realli no cure...cuz i neva bothur da look at rep n shiet wen i go otha forum.. i reed all ppl post when i ask fuu advice...heck.. them longass post even got good advice i skip.. FUK DAT.. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |