Charging Minors with Child Porn |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Charging Minors with Child Porn |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Sing to Me ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,825 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 10,808 ![]() |
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28679588/
There have been a lot of cases of police arresting and charging teenagers/minors with possession and distribution of child pornography because they've been sending racy pictures through their phones. Authorities argue these measures are done to send a message. They are protecting kids from further harming themselves by risking their pictures getting put on the internet. So a 14 year old girl who sends her boyfriend a naked picture of herself could get arrested and charged for distributing child porn. However, once charged, these kids have to register as a sex offender, in some places for as long as ten years. Which means, that 14 year old girl will find it a lot harder to apply for jobs and college all because she sent a photo of herself to her boyfriend and got lumped into the same category as a child molester. Thoughts? |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,020 Joined: May 2008 Member No: 653,768 ![]() |
paralegals are people who wanted to be lawyers but were too stupid to get their undergrad and go to law school
also, tamacracker, you don't have to be married to have sex. i know this might blow your mind, but they're not the same thing. Oh and, what type of law does your "lady" work in? Just curious. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |