Log In · Register

 
Dear createBlog, sick of you Jusun
Simba
post Feb 16 2009, 11:47 AM
Post #1


Photoartist
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,363
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 399,390



Dear createBlog,

The prerequisite to understanding this letter is to have encountered some of Jusun's stances and to have realized how superficial they are. Here's the story: I think that Jusun has no great love for createBlog or its well-being. You probably think that too. But Jusun does not think that. Jusun thinks that his opinions represent the opinions of the majority—or even a plurality.

What I just wrote is not based on merely a single experience or anecdote. Rather, it is based upon the wisdom of accumulated years, spanning two continents, and proven by the fact that I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind Jusun that it's a pretty good liar most of the time. However, Jusun tells so many lies, he's bound to trip himself up someday. Let's be frank: Everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that Jusun's admins do not accept the fact that the general public is finally starting to become aware of Jusun's absence and need to abdicate from root admin. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche.

Now, why all this fuss about a few snooty calumnies? Simply put, it's because I recently informed Jusun that his torchbearers limit the terms of debate by declaring certain subjects beyond discussion. Jusun said he'll "look further into the matter." Well, not too much further. After all, if it gets its way, we will soon be engulfed in a Dark Age of mercantalism and indescribable horror. That's why I'm telling you that Jusun knows that performing an occasional act of charity will make some people forgive—or at least overlook—all of its noxious excesses. My take on the matter is that many organizations lie. However, Jusun lies with such ease it's troubling.

I hate to say this, but there is something grievously wrong with those moonstruck anarchists who disparage and ridicule our traditional heroes and role models. Shame on the lot of them! Rest assured, Jusun holds onto power like the eunuch mandarins of the Forbidden City—sterile obstacles to progress who control what we do and how we do it. The more I think about morally crippled, neurotic buttinskies, the more troubled I become by Jusun's nostrums. More often than not, Jusun pompously claims that it is forward-looking, open-minded, and creative. That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately.

I know some piteous hellions who actually believe that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is. Incredible? Those same people have told me that the majority of frightful, homophobic menaces are heroes, if not saints. With such people roaming about, it should come as no surprise to you that I correctly predicted that Jusun would usher in the beginning of a hideous new era of prætorianism. Alas, I didn't think it'd do that so effectively—or so soon. If I may be so bold, if Jusun feels ridiculed by all the attention my letters are bringing it, then that's just too darn bad. Its arrogance has brought this upon itself. Will rash vigilantism enthusiasts ever rise to the challenge of thwarting Jusun's unpatriotic plans? Don't bet on it.

Jusun has stated that principles don't matter. One clear inference from that statement—an inference that is never really disavowed—is that we should derive moral guidance from its glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented opinions. Now that's just careless. By challenging all I stand for, Jusun reveals his ignorance about Stalinism's polyvocality. It probably also doesn't realize that he has been trying for some time to sell the public on a blackguardism-based government. Jusun's sales pitch proceeds both pragmatically and emotionally. The pragmatic argument: The sun rises just for it. The emotional argument: Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs. As you can see, neither argument is valid, which should indicate to you that it is still going around insisting that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. Jeez, I thought I had made it perfectly clear to it that it is not the case—notwithstanding what its cranky propaganda so adamantly proclaims—that the Queen of England heads up the international drug cartel. Hence and therefore, the first response to this from its myrmidons is perhaps that at birth every living being is assigned a celestial serial number or frequency power spectrum. Wrong. Just glance at the facts: I'm not very conversant with its background. To be quite frank, I don't care to be. I already know enough to state with confidence that the spectrum of views between factionalism and Trotskyism is not a line but a circle at which uncontrollable galoots and putrid, juvenile Philistines meet. To properly place Jusun somewhere in that spectrum, one needs to realize that many people have witnessed Jusun hinder economic growth and job creation. Jusun generally insists that its witnesses are mistaken and blames its repugnant snow jobs on uncivilized, shallow ivory-tower academics. It's like it has no-fault insurance against personal responsibility. What's more, there are three fairly obvious problems with Jusun's utterances, each of which needs to be addressed by any letter that attempts to reach out to the poor, the marginalized, and those unfortunate enough to have been labeled as chauvinistic by Jusun's propaganda machine. First, Jusun should put its own house in order before it tells others what to do. Second, I am not Jusun's whipping boy. And third, I once overheard Jusun say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? Jusun said that it can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom. Can you believe that? At least its statement made me realize that in order to study the problem and recommend corrective action we must find the inner strength to think outside the box. And that's just the first step. Remember, it's easy for us to shake our heads at Jusun's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should tell Jusun what we all think of it—and boy, do I have some choice words I'd like to use. It's easy for us to say, "Jusun's ramblings are a public admission of its immaturity and insensitivity." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because there is no time and little temptation for those who work hard on their jobs and their responsibilities to make things worse. Now that that's cleared up, I'll continue with what I was saying before, that if you think you can escape from its wretched inveracities, then good-bye and good luck. To the rest of you I suggest that Jusun has been trying for some time to convince people that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully. Don't believe its hype! Jusun has just been offering that line as a means to convert lush forests into arid deserts.

I can assure you that I am reminded of the quote, "The reason I'm writing this letter is that stopping it is front and center in my work." This comment is not as snappish as it seems because when I say that Jusun carries the seeds of its own self-destruction, this does not, I repeat, does not mean that there's no difference between normal people like you and me and merciless crackpots. This is a common fallacy held by mischievous sectarians. All kidding aside, there is no place in this country where we are safe from Jusun's grunts, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack.

Wherever you look, you'll see Jusun enforcing intolerance in the name of tolerance. You'll see it suppressing freedom in the name of freedom. And you'll see it crushing diversity of opinion in the name of diversity. The acid test for Jusun's "kinder, gentler" new threats should be, "Do they still make all of us pay for its boondoggles?" If the answer is yes then we can conclude that I don't know what makes Jusun think that mediocrity is a worthwhile goal. Maybe it's been sipping cuckoo juice. The fact of the matter is that all of the bad things that are currently going on are a symptom of Jusun's predatory, incomprehensible analects. They are not a cause; they are an effect.

There are some virulent anthropophagi who are self-deceiving. There are also some who are abysmal. Which category does Jusun fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check "both". As I mentioned before, my life's work is to call people to their highest and best, not accommodate them at their lowest and least. But let me add that thought should precede any attempt at intellectual writing. Am I being unduly harsh for writing that? I think not. When the religious leaders in Jesus's time were wrong, Jesus denounced them in extremely harsh terms. So why shouldn't I, too, use extremely harsh terms to indicate that Jusun's outrage at complaints about it is indicative of its self-esteem and value system?

I must ask that Jusun's trained seals build a world overflowing with compassion and tolerance. I know they'll never do that so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to give rise to infernal gadflies. Jusun's perversions may sound comfortable and simple, but it must not be forgotten that Jusun would have us believe that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication. Not surprisingly, its evidence for that absolutely dirty claim is top-heavy with anonymous sources and, to put it mildly, it has a checkered track record for accuracy. I believe it would be more accurate for Jusun to say that it believes that it is clean and bright and pure inside. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself, but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by Jusun and its rummy partisans. To wrap up, I'll just hit the key elements of this letter one last time. First, if we submit to Jusun's definition of "counterdemonstration" and become lawless, we have lost the war for self-preservation. Second, it would be a mistake to believe that we can all live together happily without laws, like the members of some 1960s-style dope-smoking commune. And finally, myth is a stronger force than rationality.







uhhh
http://www.pakin.org/complaint/


lol @ you if you read all of that




















 
 
Start new topic
Replies
Rachel
post Feb 16 2009, 12:29 PM
Post #2


i've never wanted anything rationale.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 8,449
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 19,045



Dear god, I read like 1/3 then scrolled down and saw the website. It is actually pretty funny. And damn, some of these paragraphs be long.


QUOTE(Tomates @ Feb 16 2009, 10:26 AM) *
To be honest i couldn't read all of that. Its a lot to read but i did skim through most of it. I guess i don't feel like i have the absolute right to make any judgments because i haven't been here as long, but i will say points from what i have noticed.
I think that Jusun is on more when he really cares about certain things like the whole site renovation. He was on almost everyday for a while.
Though i don't really know him and i dont know his lifestyle but he could actually be a busy guy with what he does, but then he should think about getting a good Co-Owner then. Somebody who was an admin before and would be willing to be like the second jusun. Now it shouldnt be someone that we dont know like one of his buddies. It should be someone that everyone knows or is familiar with on here.
Sometimes it does seem like jusun forgets about this site but even so its not like everything is at a loss. We've had good people keep this place sane.


Yo dumbass, the website @ the bottom, it's an automatic complaint generator. That means, this letter=joke.
 
Maccabee
post Feb 16 2009, 01:55 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 5,880
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,382



QUOTE(Rachel @ Feb 16 2009, 11:29 AM) *
Dear god, I read like 1/3 then scrolled down and saw the website. It is actually pretty funny. And damn, some of these paragraphs be long.
Yo dumbass, the website @ the bottom, it's an automatic complaint generator. That means, this letter=joke.

I KNOW THAT!
I didnt start reading.
I skipped to the bottom and saw the spoiler.
 

Posts in this topic
ArjunaCapulong   Dear createBlog   Feb 16 2009, 11:47 AM
JosephCohen123   hmmm...I think Im gonna read that after school... ...   Feb 16 2009, 11:53 AM
Aberisk   I like your vocabulary :]   Feb 16 2009, 12:02 PM
doughnut   oh god the 6th paragraph is huuuuge.   Feb 16 2009, 12:02 PM
Rachel   Dear god, I read like 1/3 then scrolled down and s...   Feb 16 2009, 12:29 PM
Tomates   QUOTE(Rachel @ Feb 16 2009, 12:29 PM) Dea...   Feb 16 2009, 12:31 PM
JosephCohen123   QUOTE(Rachel @ Feb 16 2009, 11:29 AM) Dea...   Feb 16 2009, 01:55 PM
ArjunaCapulong   oops   Feb 16 2009, 12:32 PM
Tomates   it sounded so serious though or at least the fir...   Feb 16 2009, 12:33 PM
ArjunaCapulong   yea I edited the first paragraph lol   Feb 16 2009, 12:42 PM
hypnotique   RE: Dear createBlog   Feb 16 2009, 12:54 PM
superstitious   Sealed with a kiss? I love this generator, by t...   Feb 16 2009, 01:56 PM
Melie   LOL...read 1/2 of it and realized that it just was...   Feb 16 2009, 02:02 PM
Tomates   I read hte first paragraph and it sounded convinci...   Feb 16 2009, 02:14 PM
manny-the-dino   I only read the first paragraph & scrolled dow...   Feb 16 2009, 04:12 PM
gojira   yo, i'm about to hit up all the food places an...   Feb 16 2009, 04:17 PM
ArjunaCapulong   QUOTE(gojira @ Feb 16 2009, 04:17 PM) yo,...   Feb 16 2009, 04:19 PM
9001   I have never aspired to become a speechwriter, pol...   Feb 16 2009, 04:42 PM
JosephCohen123   While you're probably sick of hearing about 90...   Feb 16 2009, 04:57 PM
fire   Screw you I read half of that. I was going to repl...   Feb 16 2009, 05:37 PM
karmakiller   I read the first three sentences and knew you didn...   Feb 16 2009, 07:03 PM
Aberisk   hehe I kept my silence when Createblog announced ...   Feb 16 2009, 07:50 PM
emberfly   lol! Those paragraphs are hilarious :D they ma...   Feb 16 2009, 07:59 PM
Beenly   tl;dr   Feb 17 2009, 07:21 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: