Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

Combat Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
fameONE
post Nov 22 2008, 03:17 AM
Post #1


^_^
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 8,141
Joined: Jan 2005
Member No: 91,466



Should those who suffer from combat PTSD be recognized as casualties? How legitimate is mental illness in comparison to a physical injury? With this, should it be appropriate for a man/woman with PTSD to receive a purple heart?
 
 
Start new topic
Replies
sixfive
post Dec 1 2008, 03:47 PM
Post #2



*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,020
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 653,768



If two individuals from the same upbringing, same control factors, are exposed to the same thing, and one suffers from PTSD and the other doesn't, then then one who didn't is (in my opinion) stronger.

QUOTE(Mipadi)
Are you arguing, then, that "weak" and "strong" have absolute definitions that are not based on the other term? If so, what is the definition of "weak", and what is the definition of "strong"? And how does saying that Person A is stronger than Person B not imply that Person B is somehow weak?

They have subjective definitions. If person A is stronger than B, then B is weak when compared to A. Take someone who can bench 400 lbs and compare them to someone who can bench 500 lbs. Compared to the latter, Mr. 400 is weaker than Mr. 500, but compared to me, he's a hell of a lot stronger. Unless everyone and everything was absolutely the same, there will be people who are weak and people who are strong.

Take two people who can both be mentally strong, but one's stronger than the other and dodges PTSD, the person who got it is, when compared to the one who didn't, weaker.
 

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: