Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

Combat Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
fameONE
post Nov 22 2008, 03:17 AM
Post #1


^_^
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 8,141
Joined: Jan 2005
Member No: 91,466



Should those who suffer from combat PTSD be recognized as casualties? How legitimate is mental illness in comparison to a physical injury? With this, should it be appropriate for a man/woman with PTSD to receive a purple heart?
 
 
Start new topic
Replies
sixfive
post Dec 1 2008, 01:12 PM
Post #2



*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,020
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 653,768



I didn't mean to label them as weak. Perhaps it would have sounded less mean if I had said "What about the people who are stronger, not that others are weak, that aren't effected the same way and aren't impacted on a daily basis?"
 
mipadi
post Dec 1 2008, 01:38 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 2,648
Joined: Apr 2008
Member No: 639,265



QUOTE(kryogenix @ Dec 1 2008, 01:12 PM) *
I didn't mean to label them as weak. Perhaps it would have sounded less mean if I had said "What about the people who are stronger, not that others are weak, that aren't effected the same way and aren't impacted on a daily basis?"

If you say one group of people is stronger, then you logically imply that the other group is weaker, since the terms are relative anyway (i.e., "weak" and "strong" aren't absolutes).

Is this to say we shouldn't bother offering medical treatment to people who get sick with diseases like pneumonia or hepatitis or the common cold, on the grounds that their immune systems are simply "weak" and a "stronger" person could simply get over the diseases on his own?
 

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: