Machiavellianism & Politics Options

[batman]

We just finished up reading The Prince and The Discourses by Machiavelli and I thought some of the ideas he brings up are very interesting and controversial. I almost wish we could spend more than just a week discussing Machiavelli, because there's just so much to talk about.

The basic Machiavellian idea is that in order to be a successful ruler, you must be able and willing to do evil/wrong/bad/malicious things to promote the stability of the state. Up until Machiavelli, we've heard time after time about the just ruler, the philosopher king, importance of values, etc.

In The Discourses, everything and anything is justifiable as long as it is in the interest of the state, including murder, manipulation, breaking promises/vows, anything that goes against the values instilled in regular humans.

There's really no moral or immoral, just... what is best for the state?

What are your thoughts about this? Do you see Obama as a Machiavellian ruler?

[fameONE]

I see your point.

Barack Obama just seems like he cars, as if America is that woman that he will do anything for and will always protect. If we were to get attacked by, let's say, North Korea, and all hell broke loose, then NoKo would, in turn, become the rapist of my previous example. A declaration of all out war, (air-strikes and amphibious landings, oh my!) would be the bigger picture of him beating the criminal to death.

By diong that, would that be considered "evil," or, "mailicious?" Or did I take the whole Machiavellianism thing into left field? Someone help a and his homeboy out.