Is Sport an Art? |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Is Sport an Art? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() ٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 14,309 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,593 ![]() |
We were having a debate about this in our Writing class earlier. Half of the class was split on this. Some say it is an art, some say it isn't. Opinions?
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() omnomnom ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,776 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 180,688 ![]() |
I understand what you're saying brooklyneast, but maybe my definition was a bit inclusive. Works of art in some way or form have purposes, but I think the parts of the work of art that give it the character of a masterpiece have no purpose. They're not there for anything. Intricate details serve no purpose at all in objects, even portraits. Of course details are needed in portraits but not the ones artists put on there that make it unique (or worthy enough to be called art). To me it's not nonsensical but it's really hard to explain how I feel about art. My theory comes from reading Oscar Wildes and he's wonderful at explaining things, if read up on some of his art theories I think it may be a little bit easier to understand.
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |