VP Debate, Palin v. Biden |
VP Debate, Palin v. Biden |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Has a PhD in horribleness ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 866 Joined: Sep 2008 Member No: 686,301 ![]() |
Starts in a half hour. Who's watching it, and what do you expect from it?
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() crushed. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 9,432 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 20,026 ![]() |
well, we'll disagree on that. but i think it was obvious that he was admitting that he was not disciplined by saying he would not change. i don't know what you wanted to hear exactly.
all the candidates oppose same-sex marriage. here's a more in-depth look at how they stand on gay marriage, among other issues: http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/issues/is...exmarriage.html |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Vae Victis ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 1,416 Joined: Sep 2006 Member No: 460,227 ![]() |
well, we'll disagree on that. but i think it was obvious that he was admitting that he was not disciplined by saying he would not change. i don't know what you wanted to hear exactly. That would be redundant, because a lack of discipline is the example that the moderator used. Also, "I'm not going to change" was transitioned into a positive context, not a critical one. He was talking about how he would stand by his principles, regardless of whether or not people want him to. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
![]() crushed. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 9,432 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 20,026 ![]() |
That would be redundant, because a lack of discipline is the example that the moderator used. Also, "I'm not going to change" was transitioned into a positive context, not a critical one. He was talking about how he would stand by his principles, regardless of whether or not people want him to. of course it was transitioned into a positive one! even though people want to hear about candidate's faults or whatever, they're most likely not going to hear about them (unless it's their opponent, obviously). it sucks, but side-stepping questions (although i think biden clearly did a better job of answering questions directly) is so common that i don't get why people are surprised when candidates go another direction. it happens alllll the time. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Vae Victis ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 1,416 Joined: Sep 2006 Member No: 460,227 ![]() |
of course it was transitioned into a positive one! Which was exactly the opposite of what the question called for. That wouldn't be an issue if the aforementioned "it" was an answer to the question in the first place. QUOTE i don't get why people are surprised when candidates go another direction. it happens alllll the time. Being critical =/= being surprised. I doubt anyone picking apart Palin's many gaffes are actually surprised about them by now. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |