@ Economy |
@ Economy |
Sep 26 2008, 12:54 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,020 Joined: May 2008 Member No: 653,768 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Sep 26 2008, 01:50 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Administrator Posts: 2,648 Joined: Apr 2008 Member No: 639,265 |
(I posted this in the Debate forum several days ago, but, you know, no one actually bothers to go in there, so I'll repost here.)
The $700 billion bailout plan is a joke. It's just a way to protect the wealthiest individuals and corporations. To quote Dennis Kucinich: QUOTE The same corporate interests that profited from the closing of U.S. factories, the movement of millions of jobs out of America, the off-shoring of profits, the out-sourcing of workers, the crushing of pension funds, the knocking down of wages, the cancellation of health care benefits, the sub-prime lending are now rushing to Washington to get money to protect themselves. The double standard is stunning: their profits are their profits, but their losses are our losses. Bernie Sanders has proposed a 5-year, 10% surtax on couples earning over $1 million a year, or individuals earning over $500,000. His logic is that, under Bush, the wealthy have benefited greatly, so it's their turn to step up and help us out of the mess they helped to create. I'm not sure I completely agree, but it doesn't seem like a bad idea, either. I definitely don't agree with the bailout. On the surface, it seems that in the short-term, it's beneficial to everyone to "save" our financial institutions -- if the economy goes south, we all lose. But Ron Paul has pointed out why saving the banks isn't a viable long-term solution: QUOTE Using trillions of dollars of taxpayer money to purchase illusory short-term security, the government is actually ensuring even greater instability in the financial system in the long term. The solution to the problem is to end government meddling in the market. Government intervention leads to distortions in the market, and government reacts to each distortion by enacting new laws and regulations, which create their own distortions, and so on ad infinitum. You should read all the above links. Kucinich, Sanders, and Paul are some of the few politicians who don't have their heads up their asses (or up the asses of corporate America). |
|
|
|
kryogenix @ Economy Sep 26 2008, 12:54 PM
ChesterRevolver This is very confusing indeed. How did it all get ... Sep 26 2008, 01:02 PM
brooklyneast05 what do you think should happen steven, do you thi... Sep 26 2008, 01:12 PM
ChesterRevolver QUOTE(brooklyneast05 @ Sep 26 2008, 02:12... Sep 26 2008, 01:25 PM
brooklyneast05 soon to be least?
uhhhh no, we aren't even ... Sep 26 2008, 01:26 PM
ChesterRevolver QUOTE(brooklyneast05 @ Sep 26 2008, 02:26... Sep 26 2008, 01:38 PM
penispumper http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul481.html
http:... Sep 26 2008, 11:07 PM
mipadi From The New York Times:
QUOTEEven as policy make... Sep 29 2008, 10:44 AM
kryogenix I think the bailout is stupid, but I also think it... Sep 29 2008, 01:55 PM
brooklyneast05 this is annoying right now, the legislation failed... Sep 29 2008, 02:07 PM
SkyliteX QUOTE(brooklyneast05 @ Sep 29 2008, 02:07... Sep 29 2008, 06:00 PM
brooklyneast05 QUOTEDow down 778, worst point drop ever, after th... Sep 29 2008, 03:49 PM
shanaynay RE: @ Economy Sep 29 2008, 05:11 PM
brooklyneast05 ^ok, how insightful into our economy you are. Sep 29 2008, 05:40 PM![]() ![]() |