technicolour |
technicolour |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Banned ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 700 Joined: Jun 2008 Member No: 658,432 ![]() |
stop spamming my inbox
or I will respond with 10 times what you spammed mine. edit - closed/moved to resolve - rebs This post has been edited by superstitious: Oct 3 2008, 04:57 PM
Reason for edit: edit - closed/moved to resolve - rebs
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Tick tock, Bill ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Administrator Posts: 8,764 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 333,948 ![]() |
I consider myself a very patient, very understanding person but you have gone above and beyond what even MY patience level can withstand.
No more duplicate accounts. For each one you create, it will get dup'd and you will get an increase in warning level. For each time you spam tutorials, you will get an increase warn level. For each time you spam reports, you will get an increased warn level. You're smart enough to understand what I'm saying. You currently have a 10% for spamming reports. I suggest you stop now. This whole "vendetta" thing is really old. I found it entertaining for a while and to some extent, I agreed at one point with some of your concerns. However, you are attacking good Design Staff members for merely clearing out a queue that YOU SPAMMED. And why even spam the queue? What did Design Staff ever do to you in the first place? You have a problem with certain members of People Staff, Head Staff and Administrators. So you spam something that Design Staff has to clean up? You got off without being warned for making duplicates (and dude, you've got pages of them) because you made them prior to the dup rule being stated. You got off without being warned for spamming tutorials because the spamming rule wasn't clear about where and when spamming rules should be applied. Good for you. You're awesome, you're clever and I applaud you. Unfortunately, as I said earlier in this post, my patience is exhausted. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Banned ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 700 Joined: Jun 2008 Member No: 658,432 ![]() |
I consider myself a very patient, very understanding person but you have gone above and beyond what even MY patience level can withstand. Mind you, we weren't told to delete anything. I did it because it irked me how much tutorials there were compared to the other pending stuff. I just wanted to level it out. I stopped when I found out Kristina was doing the same. I don't think I need to apologize to you, unless you're asshurt over a couple or so PMs from me. Seeing as how your method of retaliation backfired the first time, I suggest for you not to go through with your threat. It most likely won't improve the situation, anyway. Forgive me for not shaking in my boots ![]() QUOTE No more duplicate accounts. For each one you create, it will get dup'd and you will get an increase in warning level. For each time you spam tutorials, you will get an increase warn level. For each time you spam reports, you will get an increased warn level. You're smart enough to understand what I'm saying. You currently have a 10% for spamming reports. I suggest you stop now. Shall we see who's faster then? Me creating accounts/spamming, or you deleting/banning? It's up to you. QUOTE This whole "vendetta" thing is really old. I found it entertaining for a while and to some extent, I agreed at one point with some of your concerns. However, you are attacking good Design Staff members for merely clearing out a queue that YOU SPAMMED. And why even spam the queue? What did Design Staff ever do to you in the first place? You have a problem with certain members of People Staff, Head Staff and Administrators. So you spam something that Design Staff has to clean up? You attacked the innocent. I responded by attacking the innocent. You are responsible. QUOTE You got off without being warned for making duplicates (and dude, you've got pages of them) because you made them prior to the dup rule being stated. You got off without being warned for spamming tutorials because the spamming rule wasn't clear about where and when spamming rules should be applied. Good for you. You're awesome, you're clever and I applaud you. Unfortunately, as I said earlier in this post, my patience is exhausted. Coming from the person who PMed me begging for mercy, I'm not really scared of your idle threats. Please, continue your iron fisted tactics instead of admitting you were wrong and talking it out. You are only bringing more to our side. We were once few; now we are many. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |