peta |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
peta |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 213 Joined: Sep 2007 Member No: 571,860 ![]() |
there might be a topic about this already. i searched it. but, nothing came up.
anyway, i was watching an e! special about murders. then the show "pam. girl on the loose." came on and she never seems to shut the f**k up about peta. if you like peta, whatever. but, don't prance around with your dog on a leash while wearing a peta shirt. i can see why peta wants to help animals. but, i really hate ingrid newkirk and mary beth sweetland. they're pretty much hypocritical neo-nazi's. discuss. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() omnomnom ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,776 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 180,688 ![]() |
Then why can't humans be sacrificed to science then? It is saying they're less important because they are being sacrificed to save another race that believes they're superior based on intelligence.
No, I'm not saying cures are shampoos and cosmetics. I'm saying they test cosmetics and shampoos on animals more than they test cures because there are more brands and types of shampoos and cosmetics than recent advances in cures, am I right? Animals should not be sacrificed for health and beauty aid. If mice die in the fight for finding a cure, that's not really the issue. The issue is cats and dogs are being sacrificed to make people look prettier and that's not right. I still think humans should be tested on for health and beauty aid, if the product is for humans, it needs to remain on humans. No animals were made to be sacrificed, because keep in mind, we're animals too. Who's going to sacrifice us when they become superior? |
|
|
![]() ![]() |