DEADLINE: August 17th |
DEADLINE: August 17th |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Photoartist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,363 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 399,390 ![]() |
Ok mods, after the whole screenshot incident, we noticed Rebecca has helped calmed the community down, and that's cool. We'll play nice, no problem, but that doesn't mean we're gonna let anybody slip.
I'm challenging you mods to try to figure out what's supposed to happen with Nate, Thomas, and Dee by yourselves by the end of the week. Then make it happen! If you guys are still clueless by Sunday, I'm just going to have to give you a little help. That's by August 17th, for those of you without a calendar. Good luck! ![]() P.S. I still need the last 10% of my warning level lowered, please. Thanks! |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Cornflakes :D ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 ![]() |
I don't understand why Dee's name was brought up, I mean I'll agree about the language day thing that she could have handeled it a bit better but for the record it was the first big thing that she had to deal with as a admin. And overall I think she did fine.
As for that post, personally I didn't even see Nate's posts that were screen shot of in the topic you made a while back. And of course someone should have said something to him about it if someone had caught it, but of course she had no knowledge of it from what I would figure from her post. Oh also, I saw a post on the other page that there was a probation period that wasn't discussed? Yea, that isn't true at all. We all discussed the probation periods and the admins even PMed the people that were on their probation periods and talked to them and discussed with them what they needed to work on. No one needed to be removed from staff at that point and I don't think we made a bad choice by keeping any of them. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 ![]() |
Oh also, I saw a post on the other page that there was a probation period that wasn't discussed? Yea, that isn't true at all. We all discussed the probation periods and the admins even PMed the people that were on their probation periods and talked to them and discussed with them what they needed to work on. No one needed to be removed from staff at that point and I don't think we made a bad choice by keeping any of them. ...and why couldn't that have been said the 23346457 times it was asked about? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Cornflakes :D ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Photoartist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,363 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 399,390 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |