DEADLINE: August 17th |
DEADLINE: August 17th |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Photoartist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,363 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 399,390 ![]() |
Ok mods, after the whole screenshot incident, we noticed Rebecca has helped calmed the community down, and that's cool. We'll play nice, no problem, but that doesn't mean we're gonna let anybody slip.
I'm challenging you mods to try to figure out what's supposed to happen with Nate, Thomas, and Dee by yourselves by the end of the week. Then make it happen! If you guys are still clueless by Sunday, I'm just going to have to give you a little help. That's by August 17th, for those of you without a calendar. Good luck! ![]() P.S. I still need the last 10% of my warning level lowered, please. Thanks! |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 ![]() |
how come if i were to say, right now, that i think james is the biggest f****t that ever strolled these forums, and gets ass raped every night for his own pure pleasure, i'd be warned in a heartbeat, but because nate is part of the higher ups, it takes longer to discuss? why should my punishment be based solely on what i said right then and there and me not have a chance to say that what i had posted was justified?
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |