EXTENDED NETOWRK BANNERS SHOULDNT BE REQUIRED |
EXTENDED NETOWRK BANNERS SHOULDNT BE REQUIRED |
Jul 17 2008, 06:00 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Citra ![]() Group: Member Posts: 6 Joined: Mar 2008 Member No: 628,793 |
i am having a bit of a hard time as to why you suddenly require extended network banners. i have a layout series [NEBULA], and i usually get lots of requests to make new ones with different color schemes. i currently have 3 of them. and my 4th one was rejected because of this new guideline. i know that my layouts are high quality and adding a extended network banner isnt going to make them any better, it will actually make them look worse. cant the rule just be "extended network banners are encouraged but if your layout looks fine without it, we will accept it" WHY NOW, why is this rule necessary, extended netowrk abnners arent supposed to have a background image. ughh so stupid and ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Jul 18 2008, 03:05 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Head Staff Posts: 18,173 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 108,478 |
unless the layout has poor quality images then i can see how all three are needed. MySpace defaults or myspace standard layouts? defaults are like no CSS except a background. Poor image quality = automatic rejection, no matter how nice the rest of the layout looks. Sorry, MySpace standard layouts. It's just that I think of defaults and standards as being non-DIV overlays, haha. All my friends hate extended network banners because they look cheesy. To me, it makes the layout look like it's from some Pimp-My-Space. Maybe they've seen too many bad extended networks, then, but there are plenty on CB that don't look like they're from that site. Some recently submitted examples: http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=29592 http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=29582 http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=28966 And why is that? Personally, I think it's because CreateBlog's standards are high, so although you may think they're too high, I think it's necessary for the site to keep its standards above that of other MySpace layout domains. although this did get rejected Ruki - the GazettE for lacking a background... which wasn't really needed but i submitted one with one. I thought the layout was okay without a background too, but like I said, I was following the submission guidelines. QUOTE The staff is actually discussing being more flexible about the criteria for MySpace standard layouts, so please wait and see if the guideline will be changed/updated yet again. =)
|
|
|
|
Citra EXTENDED NETOWRK BANNERS SHOULDNT BE REQUIRED Jul 17 2008, 06:00 PM
schizo Well, I agree with you somewhat. Your Nebula layou... Jul 17 2008, 06:26 PM
jaeminnie QUOTE(schizo @ Jul 17 2008, 07:26 PM) Dif... Jul 17 2008, 06:46 PM
karmakiller (You spelled "network" wrong.)
I'm... Jul 17 2008, 06:37 PM
Citra QUOTE(karmakiller @ Jul 17 2008, 06:37 PM... Jul 18 2008, 01:45 AM
schizo I agree that "tastes" is probably a bett... Jul 17 2008, 07:17 PM
jaeminnie QUOTE(schizo @ Jul 17 2008, 08:17 PM) So ... Jul 17 2008, 07:30 PM
SharperMyspace I totally agree. I have seen so many layouts here ... Jul 17 2008, 07:48 PM
jaeminnie QUOTE(SharperMyspace @ Jul 17 2008, 08:48... Jul 17 2008, 08:06 PM
SharperMyspace Skinny layouts look awful with extended network ba... Jul 17 2008, 08:27 PM
jaeminnie QUOTE(Citra @ Jul 18 2008, 02:45 AM) i ju... Jul 18 2008, 07:26 AM
Citra QUOTE(jaeminnie @ Jul 18 2008, 07:26 AM) ... Jul 18 2008, 05:09 PM
jaeminnie QUOTE(Citra @ Jul 18 2008, 06:09 PM) well... Jul 18 2008, 05:35 PM
Blaqheartedstar I think that if a layout style is popular and the ... Jul 18 2008, 08:18 AM
SharperMyspace QUOTE(Blaqheartedstar @ Jul 18 2008, 08:1... Jul 18 2008, 09:47 AM
Blaqheartedstar QUOTE(SharperMyspace @ Jul 18 2008, 10:47... Jul 18 2008, 10:33 AM
jaeminnie Hey, sorry for the wait; a lot of CB issues have c... Jul 23 2008, 07:07 PM
Citra Thank you :D im submitting one now. Jul 24 2008, 11:13 PM
jaeminnie QUOTE(Citra @ Jul 25 2008, 12:13 AM) Than... Jul 27 2008, 01:53 PM![]() ![]() |