Sexy Sig Movement Volume 2, o(-( Options

[SuckDickNSaveLiv...]

http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=205505

Continuation of where volume 1 left off.

How is this not acceptable? Never once did I mention post porn in your sig. I just said put up a sexy avatar. Someone may put a pic of their fav celebrity fully clothed and consider that sexy. My topic should be reopened.

[*paperplane*]

No, it has nothing to do with children. It has to do with it not being work appropriate. Or home appropriate, for those who have parents who concern themselves with what their kids are viewing online. Etc, etc. This may not be issues you have to concern yourself with, but that doesn't mean you should be able to alienate everyone else who uses this site. Yes, everyone could turn avs/sigs off, but why would they want to do that just because you like to see how much you can get away with?

And actually, I do post on a really active forum in which all avatars have to be of something either cute or delicious. Most all the posters are male, 18-25 (give or take). The rules are to prevent borderline and tasteless things such as giant boobs from being all over the site, so that people may post at work and whatnot.

Also, boob appearances on shows are not the main point of shows. If we have 50 or 20 or however many people posting on here with "sexy sigs," that's excess.