Alright staff, explain |
Alright staff, explain |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Banned ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 700 Joined: Jun 2008 Member No: 658,432 ![]() |
Flood control: You may post in 31489766 seconds
What the f**k is that? Not only am I on preview, but you pull this shit on me? Either you quit playing this shit and we talk this over, or I pull my own bullshit and let 100 accounts talk for me. Your call. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Banned ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 700 Joined: Jun 2008 Member No: 658,432 ![]() |
Anyway, I'm confused as to what the actual point of this topic is; I originally thought you only wanted an answer as to why you were hit with flood control for such a long period of time, but the screenshot Rebecca's post (to which you responded, "What the f**k is your point?") pretty much shows that they (staff) didn't impose that upon you. However, that's not good enough so since you want it spelled out for you, chalk up the ridiculous flood control to a site error; after all, you yourself admitted that No, you illiterate turd swine. The reason I'm able to post is because the site does a terrible job of preventing people who they don't want posting from posting. Ask the mod staff circa last year. Have the admins tried to fix the problem? Nope. They seem to be fine with a 1 year flood control, which is effectively a 1 year ban. QUOTE Anyway, as for why you were actually warned or if you were singled out--again, I did not think this was the original point of the thread, as after both Dani and Rebecca addressed those two issues, you went and started yelling that "You guys are still missing the point." All three admins replied--two out of the three addressed that the flood control should not have been as long as it was stated in the error message; all three explained that you were not singled out. OK then how about fixing it? All I'm getting is pretty much "LOL SUX 4 U!" Where is the solution? LOL they say I'm not singled out. Sure, I believe them! What a piece of shit. QUOTE So what if you didn't "respond seriously to [Dani's] PMs because it was such a bullshit request"? The point was that a staff member deemed your repeated posting of such a chain letter to be spammish; you had your fun, and after a couple times, you were asked on multiple occasions to stop. I hardly think that constitutes as unfair. Even though you changed the lead-in of your post each time to fit the situation, we all know that you're intelligent enough to understand that a) it was generally irrelevant to the topic at hand and b) you were asked to stop. Maybe because the point is that the staff member is wrong? How about you stop breathing? ZOMG I asked you to stop, WHY AREN'T U STOPPING?!?!?! I'm not going to stop when I'm doing nothing wrong. QUOTE You're trying to slide by on technicalities, and everyone clearly knows that you're just trying to be difficult. You bitch that staff is ignoring you; why should they bother when their words fall upon deaf ears? I'm surprised that they haven't just pulled what they did on Seon Ho and are putting up with you instead.[/font] And everyone knows you're sucking up so that you can be on staff again with ur BFF Jill. I'm following the rules. If I wanted to be difficult I'd make several accounts, evade their pitiful bans, and spam the boards with the gun with several hundred accounts. I'M TRYING TO WORK WITH THESE PEOPLE. But they keep trying to make it difficult. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |