JOCKERS AMONG US!, be cautious with these people |
JOCKERS AMONG US!, be cautious with these people |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Naomi loves you. Y'all may call me NaNa ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,925 Joined: Jun 2006 Member No: 427,774 ![]() |
As a member on CB I ran across some jockers, that jocked me. I'd like to announce them because if they jocked me, they would jock YOU, so when they submit a layout, check out their codes and make sure they're not your codes. A jocker is always a jocker.
Jockers: Ultimate MySpace If you know of any more jockers, list them here. I think we have a right to know who our jockers are. These jockers are most active in website. The name with the * means they've jocked twice. Edit: Fixed most grammatical errors.. - Cristy This post has been edited by Synesthesia: Jun 15 2008, 12:06 PM
Reason for edit: The "amoung" and other grammatical errors bothered me too much. - Cristy
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() This bag is not a toy. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 3,090 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 583,108 ![]() |
For standard layouts unless someone has done something truly unique with their layout that has been copied, it's true that most of them look the same and are going to be using the same classes and IDs anyway. It's true that in a lot of cases you can't really claim ownership of a stylesheet, but the issue is taking someone else's CSS and just changing some colors/images and using the exact same layout. That takes absolutely no work and is pretty low from a designer's standpoint, don't you think?
I personally don't care if people use/modify/copy my code, though, so I guess I'm not too terribly sympathetic in these situations. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |