Log In · Register

 
Genetic link to smoking addiction., Cigarettes
brooklyneast05
post Apr 7 2008, 10:25 PM
Post #1


I'm Jc
********

Group: Mentor
Posts: 13,619
Joined: Jul 2006
Member No: 437,556



QUOTE
Cigarettes may interact with our genes

Scientists have identified genetic variations that raise the risk of lung cancer for smokers and former smokers.

There is some evidence to suggest that they may make carriers more addicted to tobacco.

Three research teams, writing in the journals Nature and Nature Genetics, each pinpointed two key areas of variation on chromosome 15.

The variants are common in the population - but they only raise lung cancer risk in those who have smoked.

Current or former smokers who carry two copies of both variants, one from each parent - about 15% of the total - have a raised risk of 70-80%.

Those who carry one copy of each variant have a raised risk of around 28%.


The researchers differ on exactly how the key variants influence lung cancer risk.

A team from Icelandic company deCODE Genetics - which carried out the largest of the studies - say their work suggests that carrying the variants makes people more addicted to tobacco once they start smoking.

But an international team, including scientists from the Institute of Cancer Research, the University of Cambridge and Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, believe it is more likely that the variants interact directly with tobacco to cause lung cancer.

This may be by increasing the likelihood that nicotine will trigger the uncontrolled cell division associated with cancer.

All the researchers agree the work is a major stop forward in identifying people at risk for non-small cell lung cancer - which makes up 80% of all lung cancer cases.

Thousands studied

Each of the research groups studied the DNA of thousands of current and former smokers, but each worked with a different sample, atlhough all were people of European descent.

However, they all found that a particular pattern of gene variation at two points of chromosome 15 was more common among people who developed lung cancer, than among those who remained healthy.

It is unclear whether the key set of variations affect just one gene, or three closely connected genes.

Dr Lesley Walker, of the charity Cancer Research UK, said: "We know that smoking greatly increases the risk of lung cancer - causing nine out of ten cases of the disease.

"This research tells us there are some smokers who are even more vulnerable to lung cancer because of their genetic profile."

Professor Chris Amos, from the MD Anderson Cancer Center, and lead author of one of the studies, warned that lung cancer was a complex condition.

"There are so many different cancer-causing compounds in tobacco smoke that it is hard to separate them and we don't fully understand the mechanisms that cause lung cancer."

Smokers who do not have the variants are still more than 10 times more likely to get lung cancer than people who have never smoked, whose risk is less than 1%.



DON'T SMOKE
 
 
Start new topic
Replies
illriginal
post Apr 9 2008, 06:05 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,349
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 455,274



QUOTE(brooklyneast05 @ Apr 7 2008, 11:25 PM) *
DON'T SMOKE

Homie... did you know our DNA consist of our blood line/ancestry? LOL... Allah said so, science is proving it, as well as people who have true self knowledge. thumbsup.gif

Science for God... FTW! Atheist who depend on science to prove God is a fake are gonna shit themselves laugh.gif


Sorry off topic... but yeah, addictions are passed down, just like psycho-paths, murderers/assassins, personality traits, etc..
 
Just_Dream
post Apr 10 2008, 06:21 AM
Post #3


durian
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 13,124
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 3,860



QUOTE(Tamacracker @ Apr 9 2008, 04:05 PM) *
did you know our DNA consist of our blood line/ancestry?

No shit, sherlock. Considering DNA are replications that are passed down (inherited) from parents (aka ancestors), I think we can all safely bet that "DNA consists of our blood line/ancestry". DNA is practically the main thing that is transferred in sexual reproduction (omgz I said it! Here it comes...).



And well, hey I think it's possible that drugs can alter genes (affecting nucleotides and whatnot), so yea I do believe this article JC posted. Although I can't help but go out to hookah occasionally. sweating.gif
 
heyo-captain-jac...
post Apr 10 2008, 10:12 AM
Post #4


/人◕‿‿◕人\
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 8,283
Joined: Dec 2007
Member No: 602,927



I wouldn't doubt it. It seems pretty obvious, really.



QUOTE(Just_Dream @ Apr 10 2008, 06:21 AM) *
DNA is practically the main thing that is transferred in sexual reproduction (omgz I said it! Here it comes...).

And I was convinced that it was gonorrhea.
 

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: