Quality Standards? |
Quality Standards? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Adobe Addict ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 1,237 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 113,043 ![]() |
Alright. I have nothing personal against these designs, or their designers. In fact, some of these designers have other great layouts. However, I think that the ones on this list are EITHER...
A. Too simple for a DIV layout (not much content either) B. Too simple for a Standard layout (no banners or contact tables...) C. Low image quality D. Inadequate designing Granted, some are better or worse than others. Are we adhering to what was discussed ealier about slightly raising quality standards as we go? I know that was a topic that all of us agreed on before I stepped down. Whether or not the mods are, it seems as if the quality of some layouts accepted is below the standards that we had. http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=25363 http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=25268 http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=25263 http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=25262 http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=25260 http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=25294 http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=25273 http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=25215 Take it or leave it, but that's what I think. Does the community feels the same way I do? *NOTE: I paid no attention to who accepted these. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() This bag is not a toy. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 3,090 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 583,108 ![]() |
^My thoughts exactly. xD
On the subject of multiple people reviewing.. The head staff and administrators do frequently go in the queue and look over what's been accepted and rejected. Nine times out of ten, something that's been rejected will stay that way, because it's that often that we all agree on something that has been rejected. What happens far more often is that someone has accepted something that needs to be rejected, and those odds don't exactly work in the submitter's favor, do they? So in a sense, we do have multiple people reviewing what comes into the queue, and I think the way we do things is rather efficient. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |