Log In · Register

 
Quality Standards?
digitalfragrance
post Feb 10 2008, 07:12 PM
Post #1


Adobe Addict
******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 1,237
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 113,043



Alright. I have nothing personal against these designs, or their designers. In fact, some of these designers have other great layouts. However, I think that the ones on this list are EITHER...

A. Too simple for a DIV layout (not much content either)
B. Too simple for a Standard layout (no banners or contact tables...)
C. Low image quality
D. Inadequate designing

Granted, some are better or worse than others.

Are we adhering to what was discussed ealier about slightly raising quality standards as we go? I know that was a topic that all of us agreed on before I stepped down. Whether or not the mods are, it seems as if the quality of some layouts accepted is below the standards that we had.

http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=25363
http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=25268
http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=25263
http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=25262
http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=25260
http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=25294
http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=25273
http://www.createblog.com/layouts/code.php?id=25215

Take it or leave it, but that's what I think. Does the community feels the same way I do?

*NOTE: I paid no attention to who accepted these.
 
 
Start new topic
Replies
Masta_Shih
post Mar 13 2008, 11:12 PM
Post #2


doing it for teh lulz
***

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 76
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 129,592



I've always felt that despite the differing quality tastes of all the moderators who accept layouts, createBlog has always been a place where you can find the most exceptional and cutting edge and innovative layouts. The most eye-pleasing, simply the best in cyberspace. I've always agreed that default style layouts should not be accepted, we can leave those to the lesser websites. createBlog's got some real talent, y'all really do. I've had my share of layouts (even DIV layered ones) rejected, I'm not bitter, life goes on. The fact is that we should have more than one person review the layout submission. Do the reviewers judge holostically? I know I wouldn't. Because of differing tastes, and the whole debate between whether we want more hits or higher quality layouts, I believe we should expand the reviewing staff, or have some sort of a showcase of how y'all grade.
 

Posts in this topic
digitalfragrance   Quality Standards?   Feb 10 2008, 07:12 PM
freeflow   As you may or may not know we hired a bunch of new...   Feb 10 2008, 07:16 PM
Insurmountable   I agree, The first one for one, the whole default...   Feb 10 2008, 07:18 PM
digitalfragrance   Toya - I know, but I think that it oughta be broug...   Feb 10 2008, 07:20 PM
freeflow   QUOTEI'm not sure we've even told them mor...   Feb 10 2008, 07:22 PM
digitalfragrance   ^ Sure, I totally agree. It does take a little wh...   Feb 10 2008, 07:31 PM
MissHygienic   What's causing confusion for me is what's ...   Feb 10 2008, 07:33 PM
freeflow   ^ Yea that happens a lot. Honestly though, most of...   Feb 10 2008, 07:33 PM
libertie   I'm totally with Whitney on the whole "we...   Feb 10 2008, 07:45 PM
MissHygienic   I try to keep all factors in mind when going throu...   Feb 10 2008, 07:51 PM
pandora   Except for the last one, I dont see anything wrong...   Feb 10 2008, 08:12 PM
brooklyneast05   as already said we have a completely new design st...   Feb 10 2008, 08:48 PM
SharperMyspace   You guys here might think they are low quality. Bu...   Feb 10 2008, 08:55 PM
libertie   QUOTE(SharperMyspace @ Feb 10 2008, 07:55...   Feb 10 2008, 09:29 PM
Masta_Shih   I've always felt that despite the differing qu...   Mar 13 2008, 11:12 PM
brooklyneast05   ^multiple people go through the queue. it's un...   Mar 13 2008, 11:18 PM
freeflow   We do have guides for both layouts and graphics th...   Mar 13 2008, 11:21 PM
pandora   The mods as a whole usually agree on most, if not ...   Mar 14 2008, 05:33 AM
Insurmountable   Well repeating what has already been spoken, the d...   Mar 14 2008, 11:41 AM
MichelleYue   lol, these look better than 9/10ths the shit I see...   Mar 14 2008, 01:04 PM
libertie   ^My thoughts exactly. xD On the subject of multip...   Mar 14 2008, 02:29 PM
RockItStudios   oi. actually, those stripe layouts, i was pretty p...   Mar 14 2008, 11:00 PM
emberfly   QUOTE(RockItStudios @ Mar 14 2008, 11:00 ...   Mar 20 2008, 04:46 PM
brooklyneast05   QUOTE(emberfly @ Mar 20 2008, 04:46 PM) p...   Mar 20 2008, 05:58 PM
misoshiru   QUOTE(emberfly @ Mar 21 2008, 05:46 AM) p...   Mar 23 2008, 01:25 PM
brooklyneast05   QUOTE(misoshiru @ Mar 23 2008, 01:25 PM) ...   Mar 23 2008, 01:28 PM
Insurmountable   ^I don't think you really should be worried ab...   Mar 14 2008, 11:10 PM
RockItStudios   i wasn't worried, and i didn't realize thi...   Mar 15 2008, 11:10 AM
Melie   well i also feel that there are some layouts that ...   Mar 16 2008, 11:06 PM
MissHygienic   QUOTE(Melie @ Mar 16 2008, 11:06 PM) well...   Mar 16 2008, 11:40 PM
Melie   QUOTE(MissHygienic @ Mar 16 2008, 11:40 P...   Mar 16 2008, 11:43 PM
superficial   QUOTE(Melie @ Mar 16 2008, 09:06 PM) well...   Mar 16 2008, 11:43 PM
Insurmountable   QUOTE(Melie @ Mar 17 2008, 12:06 AM) well...   Mar 17 2008, 12:18 AM
pandora   just back to check on things before i gotta go aga...   Mar 16 2008, 11:49 PM
Melie   QUOTE(pandora @ Mar 16 2008, 11:49 PM) ju...   Mar 16 2008, 11:56 PM
MissHygienic   Emberfly, standards were lower back then. I'm ...   Mar 20 2008, 04:56 PM
Insurmountable   We have done a lot of major house cleanings but I ...   Mar 21 2008, 09:22 AM
misoshiru   lol. forreals?   Mar 23 2008, 11:01 PM
Kevinkatalyst   I can see where digital fragrance is coming from b...   Mar 24 2008, 01:47 AM


Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: