f**k No Sex Before Marriage Options

[Tung]

Honestly, the people who believe in not having sex before marriage is setting themselves for a huge risk. Why you ask? You're about to marry someone you've never had sex with, and after you're married, they are going to be your sex partner for the rest of your life.

People who say sex isn't a big deal and that important in a healthy relationship are kidding themselves. There are those who have sexual chemistry, and some who just have general personality chemistry. Also, of course you can have both. What I'm saying is that, why set yourself up for a risk and marry someone you haven't sexually experienced yet? You two could be have the best relationship and get married. However, what happens after you guys get married, and your partner totally sucks at sex? You're screwed, and stuck with that person for the rest of your life, until maybe you want a divorce. But why go through all that, and deal with the financial burden of one?

Also, it's also a good thing, to live with someone you're about to marry. Again, you're going to be with your spouse for quite some time under the same roof after you're married. I've seen too many times couples who never lived with one another, get married, and move in together for the first time. They have so much problems with living with one another.

So I say, f**k the no sex before marriage rule. Have all the sex you can get in the relationship before getting married, and know what you are getting yourself into.


edit: oops posted in wrong forums. mod move to relationship plox.

[absinthe]

You do realize... cross referencing anything on google is the proper way to research right?... You do multiple of searches and try to prove the authenticity of it. Vietnam Census people... C'MON!!!

Cross referencing comes into the picture when you have background knowledge of the subject, and reliable sources. Start coughing up scholarly essays, cross reference those, and then we'll talk.

LOL I don't give a shit about what you think or anyone else thinks to be quite frank. You're just another human being... nothin special to me nor anyone else in this forum. So you can take my word for it or not.. I don't give a daaaamn. lol

I'm not even sure about what you're referring to. I said that your style on the board just isn't going to fly.

Read. Comprehend. THEN respond.

Yeah normally it's like playin chess you see... I read their moves and either play along with them or just drop it because at the end of it all.. it's some how gonna become a flame war. Like it normally becomes at the end -,-

Which once again, is because of the rude and crass way you choose to debate.

[illriginal]

Cross referencing comes into the picture when you have background knowledge of the subject, and reliable sources. Start coughing up scholarly essays, cross reference those, and then we'll talk.

Or you could use DNA to prove who's origin is from where/who. For example did you know Genghis Khan's Y chromosomes are in millions of men around the world?... Yep.

But let me ask you, what resources do you have that shows that Vietnamese in no way, shape or form have any relations with Mongolians. If you don't mind me asking.

PM me if you can... I'll leave thread so it gets back on topic.

I'm not even sure about what you're referring to. I said that your style on the board just isn't going to fly.

Ok
But I don't even think we were debating. It's nonsense to debate it. It's just personal view...

how is she a wannabe asian when shes actually... asian?

Yeah I kinda figured that one out a while ago pandora -,-