f**k No Sex Before Marriage |
f**k No Sex Before Marriage |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() ٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 14,309 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,593 ![]() |
Honestly, the people who believe in not having sex before marriage is setting themselves for a huge risk. Why you ask? You're about to marry someone you've never had sex with, and after you're married, they are going to be your sex partner for the rest of your life.
People who say sex isn't a big deal and that important in a healthy relationship are kidding themselves. There are those who have sexual chemistry, and some who just have general personality chemistry. Also, of course you can have both. What I'm saying is that, why set yourself up for a risk and marry someone you haven't sexually experienced yet? You two could be have the best relationship and get married. However, what happens after you guys get married, and your partner totally sucks at sex? You're screwed, and stuck with that person for the rest of your life, until maybe you want a divorce. But why go through all that, and deal with the financial burden of one? Also, it's also a good thing, to live with someone you're about to marry. Again, you're going to be with your spouse for quite some time under the same roof after you're married. I've seen too many times couples who never lived with one another, get married, and move in together for the first time. They have so much problems with living with one another. So I say, f**k the no sex before marriage rule. Have all the sex you can get in the relationship before getting married, and know what you are getting yourself into. edit: oops posted in wrong forums. mod move to relationship plox. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() ‹(. .)› ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 2,367 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 20,089 ![]() |
i could understand tamacracker's point of view. he basically thinks like my grandparents.
so any "debate" going on between him and the rest of us is purely difference in opinion between "american individualism" and his traditionalist closed mindedness. tamacracker, though i do believe that sex was once perceived as only for procreation, you're making it seem like we've evolved into sex-crazed animals (although for some of us i guess that'd be true, har har har). i personally disagree with your standpoint, but i do respect you a teeny bit more that you appear to stand behind your old-school beliefs. there aren't that many people i know who still think that way. why are we talking about race in a topic about premarital sex? this is completely off topic. 'cause he digressed into the issue of morality and its corellation with race. then he called christina mongolian. so yah ;o. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 6,349 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 455,274 ![]() |
i could understand tamacracker's point of view. he basically thinks like my grandparents. so any "debate" going on between him and the rest of us is purely difference in opinion between american 'individualism' and his traditionalist closed mindedness. tamacracker, though i do believe that sex was once perceived as only for procreation, you're making it seem like we've evolved into sex-crazed animals (although for some of us i guess that'd be true, har har har). i personally disagree with your standpoint, but i do respect you a teeny bit more that you appear to stand behind your old-school beliefs. there aren't that many people i know who still think that way. Movies, radio, tv shows, music of nearly any genre. Nuff said. Not many people respect others for their views.. specially when they seem like they're the same as their parents or even grandparents. But oh well... it's their lives and their problems.. not mine. First off, you just admitted that your knowledge of the subject goes as far as a Google search. That being said, I have no idea where you get such conviction in the statement from. You do realize... cross referencing anything on google is the proper way to research right?... You do multiple of searches and try to prove the authenticity of it. Vietnam Census people... C'MON!!! And that's nothin... I'm just speakin about current day population. QUOTE And what kinda question is that? You know Tamacracker, after all the other times you've gotten pwnd for being a self-righteous prick, I'd have thought you had learned that being an all-knowing close-minded contrary to everything someone says on CB just doesn't work. LOL I don't give a shit about what you think or anyone else thinks to be quite frank. You're just another human being... nothin special to me nor anyone else in this forum. So you can take my word for it or not.. I don't give a daaaamn. lol QUOTE And for all the crap you whip up about CB's general lack of decency, and manners, you sure as hell have a funny way of debating. /offtopic Yeah normally it's like playin chess you see... I read their moves and either play along with them or just drop it because at the end of it all.. it's some how gonna become a flame war. Like it normally becomes at the end -,- |
|
|
![]() ![]() |