Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

Happy Happy
pandora
post Feb 22 2008, 09:42 PM
Post #1


i did your boyfriend
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 3,335
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,071



Should the happiness of others be the primary motivator for moral action?
 
 
Start new topic
Replies
NoSex
post Feb 23 2008, 10:47 AM
Post #2


in the reverb chamber.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,022
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 300,308



It's sort of an irrelevant question given my philosophical "understanding" of "human nature." I'm an adherent of selfism and psychological egoism - I think all men act in self-interest and are incapable to treat, as Kant proposed as a criteria for truly "moral action," other human beings as an end as opposed to a means. So, since all people have the primary concern of of themselves, they couldn't even act in order, merely, to ensure the happiness of others.

Secondly, happiness is a very ambiguous and broad term. To revolve any moral theory around such an idea is an effort in futility.

And, lastly, the question is even more irrelevant given my stance of amoralism. If you don't believe in morality in the first place, the question is sort of meaningless. And, even if you do believe in morality, I would argue the question is still meaningless - y'all just don't realize it yet.
 
kryogenix
post Feb 23 2008, 11:26 AM
Post #3


Sarcastic Mr. Know-It-All
******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 2,089
Joined: Dec 2003
Member No: 29



lol, you and Kant, of all people.
 

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: