less civil liberties = saftey? Options

[brooklyneast05]

is it better to have more domestic surveillance than run the risk another 9/11? does taking away civil liberties make us more safe or is it unnecessary and pointless?


something along those lines.

[lkajsfklajskds]

I think this is a problem the human society will never overcome.
No matter what, we're in danger. And yet, lack of civil liberties will only result to mass protest. Mass protests lead to things beyond simple arguments.

One race/religion/sex or simply on kind of a person, will always have something to say about another. We were always in danger of something even before 9/11. Yet for some reason, after 9/11, airport security suddenly got stronger. There was always a threat of somebody hijacking a plane. So, as a result, it takes us longer to get through checking at the airport. Not sure if this is some sort of civil liberty, but its somewhere along those lines. So, if you are asking: Will stronger security weaken the chances of another 9/11? Then my answer would be, of course. But the con to this is more angry people. And angry people doesnt sound that bad until they completely block the entrance to the airport, then what?

Omg, I just reread everything and even i dont get what I'm saying
I mean, i get what im saying, but i dont think i really showed it in what i just typed up. But i cant find another way to rephrase it