Homosexuals, are they Ok or just wrong? Options

[Kitsune_black666]

Seriously, now. Do you think Homosexuals go against God or are they alright people? Or is what they do just wrong all around?

[Spirited Away]

Well I'd reckon that people are able to understand sarcasm...or do you not do the sarcasm thing too often?  Or are you too narrow minded to believe that people are intelligent. 

Well, maybe the same of my 'narrow mindedness' is true for you, after all you couldn't even detect that the very last bit in that post was as sarcastic was the first part of it.

On the other hand you do have a point that often times people have people who are against gay marriages...however...."If you believe in gay marriages then you must believe in the freedom to think however you want" that's untrue...

Truths are overrated and overstated. Your truths may not be the same as mine. But I do admit that I was careless in stating that, but I do have the facts to back it up in this certain debate.

I believe in liberal ideals...not in the freedom to think however you want.  It's similar in a way...but it's more of being against traditional views then believing that people should have the freedom to think however you want.  But the fact of the matter is the "freedom to think however you want" is basically granted in every form of government...but the freedom to express what you think isn't always available.

But in our case, it is. Who's going to stop me from saying that I do not like sodomy? Who's going to stop me from saying that I believe gay marriages is morally wrong? If it is my 'truth' then who are you to change them?

For you to dictate how should I feel is just as 'wrong' as I saying that gay marriages is wrong. Once again, proving that we're all on equal grounds, hypocites alike. Don't be shy to admit it.

I won't hold back and I'll just blatantly criticize you since you're walking around mind me with a pitchfork up your ass admitting it all...cause you can just think the exact opposite of me.     But the only flaw I see in your arguement is that "then you must believe in the freedom to think however you want"...

Catch the one flaw that is irrelevant to the arguement is fine with me, though it is a waste of time for me to read such criticism. Are you critiquing my opposition on gay rights or are you critiquing a slight in wording while arguing and being half awake? (Some people work for a living, and working make people tired).

well isn't that a little thing call democracy my dear...and as far as I'm concerned it's why we had all those bloody wars with the british...that nice olive branch petition and the fun rioting that later went underway...so that we can express what we think.  Are you saying that because you don't support homosexuality you don't support the freedom to think however you want? 

Do you not see your own contradiction? In so many words, you said that the freedom to express isn't as readily available as the freedom to think. Acting and thinking are obviously TWO DIFFERENT things, genius.

I specifically said that I believe sodomy to be morally wrong, which is only a thought brought forth because of a debate. However, homosexuals "express" their way of thinking.

So who is in the wrong here? The one who is thinking, which is me, or the ones who are expressing/acting out their way of thinking?

Such obvious contradictions you think of are not worth my time.

Cause even communists have the ability to think whatever they want...but they can't express it in even in a constructive way when it's against the beliefs of their leaders...yes I know I am getting kind of redundant...but don't attack people and hate them and then contradict the doctrines of the country (that I am assuming that you are from) as well.  Sorry...I just had so much fun writting this up.    I'm such a nerd! 

Kindly explain the doctrine that states homosexuals are free to be homosexuals, if there is such. Maybe I'm missing out on something, if so, do forgive my lack of knowledge.

If you mean "the right to pursue happiness", please think again. Remember that everyone has a right to do just that, unless one person's pursue of happiness tramples on another's right. You lose your right as soon as your right hurts mine.

Simple, isn't it? Nerds usually think before they speak.




EDIT>> By the way, before anyone else gets on my case: sometimes, there's nothing wrong with being immoral or 'wrong'. But even if you're 'right', it doesn't mean that I have to agree with your perception of what is 'right' and 'wrong'.
Just as you are entitle to being 'right', I am entitled to that as well.

As with the case of beauty, rightness or wrongness (in the sense of morality) is in the eye of the beholder. <<EDIT