Cloverfield, over hyped much? |
Cloverfield, over hyped much? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,011 Joined: Jun 2007 Member No: 533,410 ![]() |
I haven't seen it. My cousin said it sucked. Has anyone else seen it?
[ 700th post ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() tell me more. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 2,798 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 35,640 ![]() |
my fam went to see and and they HATED it.
the way it was filmed wasn't practical (according to them) and the ending was just a let down. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() in the reverb chamber. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,022 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 300,308 ![]() |
the way it twas filmed wasn't practical (according to them) and the ending was just a let down. The way it was filmed was the only vehicle at which it could move closer towards a raw and realistic experience - an experience at all, for that matter. Given the entirely unbelievable premise of the film - a monster attack - putting us into the hands of the characters, both metaphorically and literally, allows us to more easily devote ourselves to the action on the screen. It's an impressive glimpse into a moment in time and an atmosphere and tone that could never be reached with conventional photography. Complaining about the camera is akin to complaining that a book you like doesn't have an omniscient narrative - you're missing the point. This is how we know the characters, how we see the tragedy through their eyes. f**k practicality when you have visceral awe. As goes the ending, I could do with or without it - it isn't spectacular, but it is appropriate. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |