Pets vs Humans Options

[queen]

this may turn into a debate topic, but for now, i think it's better suited in the lounge.

we all know people with pets, and some of us may have pets of our own. my question to you: is your pet more important than the life of a human, say like your neighbor who lives down the street?

of course i wouldn't expect you to compare your pet/s with a family member, because to some of us, pets are members of the family. but let's say you had to choose between funding a starving child on the other side of the planet vs financing your terminally ill pet's surgery, which would you choose?

i was browsing xanga, and one of the front page posts caught my attention. it was about a dog who had undergone $13g worth of surgery only to die the next day. the blogger questioned the morality in spending that amount of money on a dog, when s/he could've nourished 100+ children in a thirdworld country for a year.

personally, i would fund any surgery my dog would need. he's just that important to me.

[MissHygienic]

Wow, this is something I actually have to think about. Putting your circumstances into consideration, here: starving child versus terminally ill dog. I am going to have to go with the child. If the dog is going to die the next day, anyway, I'd rather know that I fed a child for the day and, I don't know, know that the child didn't have to go another day without food. Rather than spending $13,000 on a pet that was going to die the following day.