Special Education/Programs for the "Mentally Challenged", Useful or useless? |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Special Education/Programs for the "Mentally Challenged", Useful or useless? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Resource Center Tyrant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 2,263 Joined: Nov 2007 Member No: 593,306 ![]() |
There has been an ongoing debate about whether or not to levy taxes to properly fund public schools. I already know of a few under-funded school districts who forced teachers to work double shifts, and many schools were not able to provide paper, pens, or pencils because no one paid enough taxes.
With that said, what is your opinion on special education that is funded by the state? Public schools are already having a hard enough time. Should people waste more time and money on people with irreconcilable disabilities, or do you believe that all people should have education, whether or not they make use of it? Discuss amongst yourselves. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Tick tock, Bill ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Administrator Posts: 8,764 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 333,948 ![]() |
I am definitely going to have to edit this later, because in complete honesty, your argument pisses me off. Why? Because I'm the mother of a child with one of those "irreconcilable disabilities."
Am I to assume that my child should be left out from public education because administrators can't figure out how to budget? Or is it moot because he'll never have a decent future, since he has one of those "irreconcilable disabilities", so why waste the money? QUOTE Well, in the title, I also clarified that it was "special ed," as in programs for those who are mentally retarded. The opposite end of the spectrum of our future leaders. I don't even know what to say to that. Too bigoted of a statement for me to take seriously. Again, will have to edit later. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Resource Center Tyrant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 2,263 Joined: Nov 2007 Member No: 593,306 ![]() |
I am definitely going to have to edit this later, because in complete honesty, your argument pisses me off. Why? Because I'm the mother of a child with one of those "irreconcilable disabilities." Am I to assume that my child should be left out from public education because administrators can't figure out how to budget? Or is it moot because he'll never have a decent future, since he has that "irreconcilable disabilities", so why waste the money? I don't even know what to say to that. Too bigoted of a statement for me to take seriously. Again, will have to edit later. What argument is pissing you off? I was proposing an idea. I didn't state my opinion on this issue. I know plenty of people who refuse to pay taxes for other people's education. I was wondering what people thought about the programs for challenged people? Stop getting your panties in a bunch; it's a debate forum. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Tick tock, Bill ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Administrator Posts: 8,764 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 333,948 ![]() |
What argument is pissing you off? I was proposing an idea. I didn't state my opinion on this issue. I know plenty of people who refuse to pay taxes for other people's education. I was wondering what people thought about the programs for challenged people? Stop getting your panties in a bunch; it's a debate forum. Fair enough. It pisses me off because it touches too close to home, that's why I mentioned "editing later." What I think is that if people are going to fund education, they fund education without discriminating those who have disabilities. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |