Consequentialism |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Consequentialism |
*Steven* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
Ends justifies the means.
|
|
|
![]() |
*Steven* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
Ooer didn't mean for that idea to come out. In regards to minorities, I think it's completely asinine to cater to their every needs and bend over backwards trying to help them and trying to make it look like we care about everyone. The minorities I'm talking about are the ones who complain about how much America sucks, and the ones who come over here illegally to take advantage of our medical system.
The 5$ was just an example I pulled out of my ass haha. Oh well, while we're on the topic of 5$... Say 5$ from this one person could be invested in a product/idea/w.e and would yield 100$ per person of a group of people. The government recognizes this as a significant gain for the 100 people to the not nearly as severe detriment of the individual. The individual doesn't want to but the government forces it. The individual is rich and the 100 people need the money desperately. Now I know a lot of things are circumstantial, but should the loss to the minority/individual be minor in comparison to the gain of the rest, why not? This is all assuming that the detriment to the individual isn't going to change his lifestyle/way of life. I don't know what I'm really talking about ![]() For instance, Bubba stole a video tape of pr0n from Suzy Q. They get mad and take this to court, disputing a 15$ video tape. This shit you would think they would have the common sense to realize that the fees/time/effort put into it would prove to be a considerably larger opportunity cost than the gain of the video. Granted, the defendant would have to pay the other's lawyer fees, they still waste a substantial amount of time over a video tape. This kind of thing happens all the time and is clogging up the legal system. What if the people in the small claims courts just said "tough shit" and told them to get over it. They would get offended, maybe even their feelings hurt, but it would free up much of the legal system for more important matters (Suzy Q stole a pr0n dvd). |
|
|
![]() ![]() |