Log In · Register

 
Idea: Reputation System, Anti-Troll Gun
Uronacid
post Dec 6 2007, 06:09 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,574
Joined: Aug 2007
Member No: 555,438



Recently I have become upset with a very specific member. I gave this member a percentage of my time, and in return they pissed me off. There has been a sudden increase in annoying members here on cB. This sudden increase of annoying members has had me thinking of a solution. I was thinking about how to make this place better. We obviously can't ban these annoying people for good. Technically they aren't breaking any rules, but suddenly it hit me. A reputation system. What if I could know there reputation before they pissed me off. If I knew what to expect then they wouldn't have bothered me in the first place.

A Reputation System


Xbox Live has a reputation system. You can give feedback on each gamer you come across, and their reputation will precede them on whatever game they play. This way, when you come across someone with a bad reputation, you'll know what to expect. You don't waste your time with people you know are a waste of time. Can you imagine if create blog had a system like this one? Trolls will loose their touch because members will know whether or not to give them the time of day.

Official members of the community would have the ability to vote on each post that a member makes within one week of the day that they posted it. Similar to the "report" button, you could have a "feedback" button. You would click this button and rate the post based on a number of positive and negative choices:
  • Negative Examples:
    • Racist
    • Bad Language
    • Annoying
    • Mean
  • Positive Examples:
    • Helpful
    • Funny
    • Nice
    • Open-Minded
The votes would tally up, and members of the community could view any member's reputation based on the percentages of the last 1000 votes. We obviously can't do anything like this yet, it would have to wait for mivron, but what do you think of this idea?
 
 
Start new topic
Replies
MissHygienic
post Dec 6 2007, 06:20 PM
Post #2


Resource Center Tyrant
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 2,263
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,306



I'm not sure if you're directing this more at the staff, but I've been pretty active on this forum for the past 2.5 weeks, and I personally think that this idea seems like a pain in the ass. It's appropriate for XBox because serious players don't want to play with jerk-offs and so they have that reputation system. But a forum? I don't see any need for all of us to go out of our way to vote negatively or positively for every some other post.

We're in no way being forced to handle these annoying people or people who ask relatively dumb questions. We can leave the topic alone, and that should already be an incentive for "trolls" to troll elsewhere, and not on CreateBlog. Instead, we're responding and fueling the fire by answering their questions which encourages them to create more and more posts. That's probably the reason why.

I know what you mean by the negative examples, but bad language and being mean? That would make this forum into some kiss-ass, happy-go-lucky, sweet-family type of forum, and that'd be essentially unappealing to everyone.
 
Uronacid
post Dec 6 2007, 06:28 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,574
Joined: Aug 2007
Member No: 555,438



QUOTE(MissHygienic @ Dec 6 2007, 06:20 PM) *
I'm not sure if you're directing this more at the staff, but I've been pretty active on this forum for the past 2.5 weeks, and I personally think that this idea seems like a pain in the ass. It's appropriate for XBox because serious players don't want to play with jerk-offs and so they have that reputation system. But a forum? I don't see any need for all of us to go out of our way to vote negatively or positively for every some other post.

We're in no way being forced to handle these annoying people or people who ask relatively dumb questions. We can leave the topic alone, and that should already be an incentive for "trolls" to troll elsewhere, and not on CreateBlog. Instead, we're responding and fueling the fire by answering their questions which encourages them to create more and more posts. That's probably the reason why.

I know what you mean by the negative examples, but bad language and being mean? That would make this forum into some kiss-ass, happy-go-lucky, sweet-family type of forum, and that'd be essentially unappealing to everyone.


I'm not directing this at staff at all. I'm directing this at the community. I believe it would reduce the amount of drama tremendously.

You wouldn't be forced to vote. It would be entirely up to you. If you were effected positively by a member then you might want to do them a favor and give them some positive feedback. However, if someone is bugging you then you would be able to anonymously give them some bad feed back so the next member will know what to expect and be less frustrated with an obnoxious post.

It's more unrealistic to expect everyone to ignore trolls that they don't know are trolls than to ignore trolls that can visibly see are trolls.

Also, this is just the brain storming stage of this idea. Those obviously wouldn't be the actual choices you would have to choose from. Those are just examples so that people understand.

QUOTE(MissHygienic @ Dec 6 2007, 06:26 PM) *
I'm not saying that it's the point to change the forum into a nicer, caring community. I'm saying that if there were restrictions to everything we say, then what purpose would subsections like The Lounge serve? Who's to judge what's mean? A few members could interpret my posts with some of the things I've said as rude, and other people may not agree. How is one supposed to regulate this? Am I going to get a bad reputation because of saying a few "f**ks" and "shits" because perhaps it offends new members?

Or, hypothetically, it is without a doubt that the older members here will cut themselves and their friends slack, even if they do spam, as opposed to new members. I think this would cause some injustice.


Then they would vote on your posts accordingly. If the majority of the members in the community find your posts offensive then you would receive negative feedback if the members gave it to you. I'm sure no-one will have a perfect record, but if the majority of your feedback is positive then you shouldn't have a problem. This idea wouldn't restrict any of your posting ability. It would simply give members an idea of how the community perceives you.

Would you give your friends bad feedback? NO, an there is nothing wrong with that. You understand your friends. Of course people will abuse the system in the beginning. That always happens when new things are put into effect. I just don't' think that a few friends are going to save a member from the wrath of an entire community (that is, if you're a real bastard).
 

Posts in this topic
Uronacid   Idea: Reputation System   Dec 6 2007, 06:09 PM
freeflow   I think its a good idea overall. The only thing I ...   Dec 6 2007, 06:17 PM
Uronacid   QUOTE(freeflow @ Dec 6 2007, 06:17 PM) I ...   Dec 6 2007, 06:18 PM
MissHygienic   I'm not sure if you're directing this more...   Dec 6 2007, 06:20 PM
Uronacid   QUOTE(MissHygienic @ Dec 6 2007, 06:20 PM...   Dec 6 2007, 06:28 PM
MissHygienic   QUOTE(Uronacid @ Dec 6 2007, 06:28 PM) I...   Dec 6 2007, 06:35 PM
Uronacid   QUOTE(MissHygienic @ Dec 6 2007, 06:35 PM...   Dec 6 2007, 06:37 PM
MissHygienic   QUOTE(Uronacid @ Dec 6 2007, 06:37 PM) Ye...   Dec 6 2007, 06:43 PM
Uronacid   QUOTE(MissHygienic @ Dec 6 2007, 06:43 PM...   Dec 6 2007, 06:47 PM
FoxLucky   QUOTE(MissHygienic @ Dec 6 2007, 06:20 PM...   Dec 6 2007, 09:33 PM
MissFits   QUOTE(FoxLucky @ Dec 6 2007, 11:33 PM) I...   Dec 7 2007, 09:58 AM
MissHygienic   QUOTE(MissFits @ Dec 7 2007, 09:58 AM) I ...   Dec 7 2007, 10:22 AM
S-Majere   QUOTE(MissHygienic @ Dec 7 2007, 10:22 AM...   Dec 7 2007, 10:41 AM
FoxLucky   QUOTE(MissHygienic @ Dec 7 2007, 10:22 AM...   Dec 7 2007, 01:24 PM
freeflow   Good point. Sounds good then at least to me. (refe...   Dec 6 2007, 06:21 PM
MissHygienic   QUOTE(freeflow @ Dec 6 2007, 06:21 PM) Ed...   Dec 6 2007, 06:26 PM
KawaiiLove   This would be a good idea, but some people wouldn...   Dec 6 2007, 06:36 PM
S-Majere   On first view, a sterling idea. It concerns me h...   Dec 6 2007, 06:41 PM
ArjunaCapulong   Dang Josh, that'd be humiliating. I dunno, ...   Dec 6 2007, 07:07 PM
Uronacid   QUOTE(ArjunaCapulong @ Dec 6 2007, 07:07 ...   Dec 6 2007, 08:44 PM
S-Majere   You've come up with some pretty neat answers t...   Dec 6 2007, 07:35 PM
ersatz   How in the world would this decrease drama?...The ...   Dec 6 2007, 09:44 PM
ArjunaCapulong   Simply put, from the looks of it, this system may ...   Dec 6 2007, 09:48 PM
digitalfragrance   Yeah, I agree with Archie. I think that we can de...   Dec 6 2007, 10:29 PM
Steven   Trolls won't lose their audience.   Dec 6 2007, 11:13 PM
Joss-eh-lime   I like this idea, but it might discourage people f...   Dec 6 2007, 11:51 PM
Uronacid   It was just an idea. Seeing if you guys liked it. ...   Dec 7 2007, 09:37 AM
Sandraaa   I hate this systeme. I can't see any advantage...   Dec 10 2007, 12:16 PM
Uronacid   QUOTE(Sandraaa @ Dec 10 2007, 12:16 PM) I...   Dec 10 2007, 01:00 PM
Sandraaa   ^ Check JC's thread backstage. >< I was...   Dec 10 2007, 01:05 PM
Michelle   There will always be drama, there will always be s...   Dec 10 2007, 06:40 PM
Uronacid   QUOTE(Michelle @ Dec 10 2007, 06:40 PM) T...   Dec 10 2007, 09:05 PM


Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: