bombings on japan, were the really needed |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
bombings on japan, were the really needed |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 664 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 7,686 ![]() |
do u guys think the 2 bombs dropped on japan during WW2 were really needed?
i say no because they just killed innoc3nt people in those 2 citys and it left a perment mental damage on my grandma (im japanese) so what do u guys think |
|
|
![]() |
*NatiMarie* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
QUOTE(uninspiredfae @ Jun 17 2004, 6:21 AM) The Japanese was in no position to make demands. They were the enemy; they chose to be the enemy; and after Pearl, they shouldn't even be thinking about making demands. We were generous to let them keep their Emperor... of course that generosity came from a selfish motive, but we were still quite generous. QUOTE The US wanted the Japanese to surrender ASAP. As you pointed out, Manchuria was invaded. Though not the same as invading the Japanese Islands, it still meant that Stalin was on the path to Japan. The US needed to end the war quick, or we might have been faced with Communist Japan. Okay...quite queasy right now (taking medication)...so let's see if I have my head put on straight. So I have two quotes to get at... ![]() Okay...so about the Emperor: The US didn't want the Japanese to keep the emperor, AT ALL. They really wanted the emperor to drop down from his position and this was already going to produce more conflict in the situation. You see, they wanted the emperor to drop down to make the situation 'all better' but of course this wasn't going to happen. The Japanese saw the emperor as a god, and was the thing that held together the Japanese culture and people. Okay, about the Stalin incident (well: kryogenix's quote): Okay, yes maybe the US had to enter the war quick, but why drop TWO atomic bombs, thus killing more innocent people, which only one atomic bomb could have been enough. I just don't see the logic in that. FDR asked for the two bombs to be dropped, but how is it that even Albert Einstein mentioned after that the atomic bombs shouldn't have been placed (after much consideration, he saw that it was unnecessary, stating that he regrets consenting the bomb to be placed). Over 59 scientists oposed the dropping of the bombs...so doesn't that say something? |
|
|
![]() ![]() |