Rules... what constitutes PG-13, I don't understand... Options

[*Uronacid*]

Alright, ever since I have been on create blog people have been posting away, cussing, and making sexual passes at eachother... talking about spiting and swallowing and showing off their tits... I don't want to see this change, in fact... I think it's very intresting, but I think it's rediculous when topics like this:

http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=146208

:are closed, and are considered inapropriate. Topics like this, where someone is asking a question that if asked in a serious manner (which it was), and being a topic that does come up in a boys locker room, is deffinitly PG-13.

and topics like this:

http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=113799

:are left open. Under-aged girls are posting pictures of their breasts on the internet while guys between the ages of 12-25 look and drool.

I mean, it just seems so rediculous. It pisses me off to see something so normal being discussed in a boy's locker room being discussed there, when admin's come along and close the topic... (I have nothing against the admin who did it)... Kathleen just jumps in there and posts about why the topic should be closed in big bold print. Why, is Kathleen jumping arounf in the boy's locker-room talking about why topics should be closed? I have no idea... why should girls have a say in what topics are inappropriate in the guys locker-room? Some topics that guys talk about are totally normal for them to talk about between each-other, and are deffinitly pg 13 if talked about in a serious manner... I don't see guys jumping from topic to topic in the girls locker room talking about how their topics should be closed... Look, personaly I think this:

http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=143178
(btw, look what kathleen said in this topic)

isnt much different than this:

http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=146208

yet she totally bashs ours, and our topic gets the close-out... I mean, cmon

how about this:

http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=143392

when you suck a penis, do you spit out the spunk or do you swallow it? Is this pg-13.... get real, you guys are so unfair to the guys locker room...

I have been meaning to bring this up for a while.. I guess I just never did, becuase I felt that you guys would just start closes all the intresting sexual topics out there... being a teenager, sex is one of the most intresting things that there is, and I don't want to see this aspect of create blog get taken away... All i want is for people to treat the boy's lockeroom with the same respect as the girls locker room... I think it's rediculous, how we are literally treated differently....

[*Statues/Shadows*]

First off, Josh(?), Learn. to. spell. My God. Eesh.

The whole matter of PG-13 has been discussed many times before. However, everytime we reach the same conclusion: that everything is fine just as it is. It ll comes down to our moderators' judgement and I do have faith that they're sensible enough to close a particularly explicit topic on masturbation or whatever the hell. If you are offended by anything in particular, my first first words of advice would be to not get offended so easily, but then, to take advantage of those dandy little report buttons.

If you really think Saved! and Charlie's Angels are particlarly suggestive for PG-13 movies, there's your problem right there. I watched Charlie's Angels before I was allowed to watch many PG-13 movies, and Saved! tried so hard to go against cliches that it became completely cliched itself, so I really don't know how you're supposed to be offended by that unless you're a completely closed-minded f**k.

All of that aside, I'm not really seeing the issue here. I get the feeling someone's trying to become the saviour by finding solutions to nonexistant problems just in time for the new modding session.

[*Uronacid*]

First off, Josh(?), Learn. to. spell. My God. Eesh.

The whole matter of PG-13 has been discussed many times before. However, everytime we reach the same conclusion: that everything is fine just as it is. It ll comes down to our moderators' judgement and I do have faith that they're sensible enough to close a particularly explicit topic on masturbation or whatever the hell. If you are offended by anything in particular, my first first words of advice would be to not get offended so easily, but then, to take advantage of those dandy little report buttons.

If you really think Saved! and Charlie's Angels are particlarly suggestive for PG-13 movies, there's your problem right there. I watched Charlie's Angels before I was allowed to watch many PG-13 movies, and Saved! tried so hard to go against cliches that it became completely cliched itself, so I really don't know how you're supposed to be offended by that unless you're a completely closed-minded f**k.

All of that aside, I'm not really seeing the issue here. I get the feeling someone's trying to become the saviour by finding solutions to nonexistant problems just in time for the new modding session.

I don't think that you can compare the suggestive scenes in Charlie's Angels (The Movie) and the suggestive images of cB. Those Women were not underaged, but as far as I'm concerned. You guys can show off your breasts all you want. I just thought and thought and thought. Well, actually I didn't think that hard. All I thought about was.. when I was underaged. I remember when I would feel the erge to look at the bare chest of someone my age. I liked the breast. Hell, every guy should like the breast. I feel bad for Homos. Even better are the breasts of a person I could relate to. I think that we should allow these underaged girls to post pictures of their breasts for all the underaged guys to see. :D

Thank you!!!

WE ALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO WHAT WE WANNA DO BUT THE ONLY THING IS..
WE SHOULD ALL KNOW OUR LIMITATIONS..

Yes, I agee. You do have a right to do what you want. I say that stupid chick breasts look the same as smart chick breasts, and if I were young again, I wouldn't care who's breasts I saw. Good point.