cB, Lenient or Strict? |
cB, Lenient or Strict? |
*steve330* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
Just came up out of curiosity. If you could have behavior changed in cB, would you want it to be stricter enforcement regarding bashing/fun(imo), or have it be more lenient. I'd post w/e but that might sugar coat the choices :)
Or would you rather it stay the same? edit: Don't have to post your opinion either, anonymity ftw :) My view of strict/lenient. Strict : Crack down more on member bashing, keeping threads more to the point and less off topic. Lenient : Allow deviation from the topic as long as it doesn't completely abandon the topic or resort to people fighting and only fighting with no regard to the topic. Allow people to voice their opinion (no matter how rude or mean). Also, feel free to post your view on leniency/strictness. |
|
|
![]() |
*tripvertigo* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
The rules are initially enforced equally. When you disobey them over and over and over again and create a reputation for yourself, people have to look at you more closely and your punishments will get more severe. If a member is spamming, I might warn them. After that they might get the picture. But if a member constantly spams, and they have already been warned numerous times before--a warning isn't going to do it. They have earned a more severe punishment. Their posts will probably be set to be previewed by other moderators, or disabled. You earn your own spot. nah, i'm not convinced. sorry. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |