kryo Options

[micron]

so kryo (james) wants to speak but complained to me that his topics are always being closed... so lets hear him out. also staff, why dont you openly discuss here about the problems kryo is causing. maybe by having the opposing views come together like this we'll be able to find a middle ground.

if you wish to participate, keep in mind that communication is a two way street. when two opposing views clash, it doesnt neccessarily mean one is entirely right and the other entirely wrong. try to be open minded, consider the opposing view(s), be honest, admit to wrongdoings when wrong, and hopefully together we'll be able to get to the bottom of this.

please keep away from personal attacks. if this topic becomes one big staff bashing thread, its going to be closed. a little tact never hurts, so lets try use this as an opportunity to learn from and understand each another.

[*SayBloodyMary*]

*sensible

Again, that's fine. However, he was causing upset, which, while it doesn't violate a specific rule, caused whoever warned him to act for what they perceived to be the greater good. If there is disagreement about that course of action (and I think we've established that there is), that is unfortunate. However, unless someone can propose a solution which means that no judgement will have to be excercised in these situations, these things will happen.

And I can't imagine anyone is upset now. That would be why action was taken then, and not today. However, if someone can say 'what a dick move,' and move on about some things, why not others?

[*tripvertigo*]

*sensible

Again, that's fine. However, he was causing upset, which, while it doesn't violate a specific rule, caused whoever warned him to act for what they perceived to be the greater good. If there is disagreement about that course of action (and I think we've established that there is), that is unfortunate. However, unless someone can propose a solution which means that no judgement will have to be excercised in these situations, these things will happen.

And I can't imagine anyone is upset now. That would be why action was taken then, and not today. However, if someone can say 'what a dick move,' and move on about some things, why not others?

i believe i have suggested a solution to this in the past. moderators shouldnt have the burden of having to exercise their "better judgement" in contreversial incidents like this when clearly their judgement may not always be right.

In situations like these, they should HAVE to consult with an administrator or headstaff so that the accountability is on higher-managements shoulders.

This makes the enforcement of REAL rules more consistant.


What I get from this topic is that when members do something wrong, or I should say when A member does something wrong (because apparently not every situation is handled in the same objective manner that it should be), they are punished to the extent of someones better judgement, which may (at most times) be total bullshit.

However, when a mod or group of mods does something wrong, nothing is done. And to avoid the situation, they close the topics that might implicate them.


And if you are going to say that he was warned for upsetting a large group of people or causing a ruckus, then I have to refer to a particular incident involving myself and certain untrue rumors that went on for weeks with absolutely no action from the moderating staff. Now more than half of this community thinks im totally schizophrenic, and in terms of what would actually happen in real life? I could sue jusun for something like deformation of character not because he LED this crusade against me, but because his staff chose not to do anything. But I guess there must be some vague selection process that the mods use to either ignore a situation and let it go for amusement purposes or to act way too brashly just because they may not like a certain person (lets say, james).


And PS:

I let your ironic mispelling of the word "illiterate" go. Have the courtesy to let mine.