kryo Options

[micron]

so kryo (james) wants to speak but complained to me that his topics are always being closed... so lets hear him out. also staff, why dont you openly discuss here about the problems kryo is causing. maybe by having the opposing views come together like this we'll be able to find a middle ground.

if you wish to participate, keep in mind that communication is a two way street. when two opposing views clash, it doesnt neccessarily mean one is entirely right and the other entirely wrong. try to be open minded, consider the opposing view(s), be honest, admit to wrongdoings when wrong, and hopefully together we'll be able to get to the bottom of this.

please keep away from personal attacks. if this topic becomes one big staff bashing thread, its going to be closed. a little tact never hurts, so lets try use this as an opportunity to learn from and understand each another.

[*SayBloodyMary*]

Sorry, but I'm still not convinced.

If I told everyone I had a penis, and it visibly upset any group of males on this forum that took an interest in my vagina, because now they might be gay, do you think you should warn me for that?

That's like warning someone for telling all the 14 yr old believers in this joint that Santa and the Easter bunny really doesnt exist.

Upsetting people is not something that should be warned for. If you upset someone but you arent breaking an actual rule in the process, i dont understand why you should be warned for it.

Well, one has to evaluate each situation individually, depending on the level of upset.

And frankly, other that forcing whoever it was who warned James to apologize, which is completely meaninless if they don't mean it, and there is no reason why they should if they think they were in the right, or possibly building a time machine, what exactly would you (or anyone, really) like us to do about the matter? Because honestly, this isn't particulalrly constructive. We realize that some people feel that situation was mishandled. So now what?

Sandra: The first one was clearly discernable as a joke, and as far as the second one goes, Podo was warned for that (well, not that one specifically, I don't think, but as part of his whole spree), so there isn't a discrepency there.

[*tripvertigo*]

And frankly, other that forcing whoever it was who warned James to apologize, which is completely meaninless if they don't mean it, and there is no reason why they should if they think they were in the right, or possibly building a time machine, what exactly would you (or anyone, really) like us to do about the matter? Because honestly, this isn't particulalrly constructive. We realize that some people feel that situation was mishandled. So now what?

first off, maybe you should read the objective of this thread. it's in the first post made by micron.

second off, we're discussing this now,

A: because james (as he's said many times) would like an apology.
B: to stop things like this from happening in the future.


I thought that was obvious.


This Is the feedback forum isnt it? I'm not just tripping here?

^ Oh, I've just seen what you meant, and Elba's spoilers were in tags (I think Rebecca added the ones to Podo's post, just to be clear), so she was fine, although somewhat tiresome, and Steven's were again clearly in jest.

So how do you know James' posts werent just in jest? Seriously, you guys have been discriminating against James like you've red flagged all his posts and then you all sit down and decide which ones can be the very LEAST considered offensive by ANY standards.