Log In · Register

 
uh important stuff
*shotgunFUNERAL*
post Jul 20 2007, 05:17 PM
Post #1





Guest






jusun says we should get the staff to decide on this because apparently sharing an account is too detrimental to cB...see:
QUOTE
the thing is, the loop holes still there. like i said, i think your best option is to get the staff members to back you to make this an official cb initiative...


should sharing accounts be allowed for official members? the rule was set back when james was snooping backstage on nicki's account, but if we were all even as official members, why should it be frowned upon to share an account? there is nothing to take advantage of. shouldn't it be our decision who uses our account?
 
 
Start new topic
Replies
illriginal
post Jul 20 2007, 05:45 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,349
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 455,274



^ Was it hard to understand what I'm saying?

Say if you have a lil uh... online crush, and they send you a private message with context of which you don't want others to know. And you forget to delete it for whatever reason. The person that's sharing that account, won't they just see it? And know about your lil crush that you don't want people knowing about?


If that's definitely not the case, then disregard my post.

QUOTE(SayBloodyMary @ Jul 20 2007, 06:37 PM) *
None of that made any sense to me, but OK.

The problem is accountability, or rather follwoing through once accountability has been established. Yes, one could manually go through and cross reference each post to establish who did what, but that takes quite a bit of time and effort. In any event, it does no good to only punish one member of the group using a username, because if you disable their account, they can still post under the shared account, which cannot be limited because it would be unjust to those who hadn't been part of the rule breaking.

Oh, and as far as the Nicki thing goes, she didn't know that I was using her account. So really, that is about as relevant as you guys 'sharing' Rico's account, which didn't end so well either, despite you being in the same user groups.



Ahhhh understood.

QUOTE(Elba @ Jul 20 2007, 06:47 PM) *
We will be sharing an account that doesn't belong to anyone specifically. It is not like we are sharing our personal accounts.



Gotcha!
 
*Elba*
post Jul 20 2007, 05:47 PM
Post #3





Guest






QUOTE(Tamacracker @ Jul 20 2007, 03:45 PM) *
^ Was it hard to understand what I'm saying?

Say if you have a lil uh... online crush, and they send you a private message with context of which you don't want others to know. And you forget to delete it for whatever reason. The person that's sharing that account, won't they just see it? And know about your lil crush that you don't want people knowing about?
If that's definitely not the case, then disregard my post.

We will be sharing an account that doesn't belong to anyone specifically. It is not like we are sharing our personal accounts.
 

Posts in this topic
shotgunFUNERAL   uh important stuff   Jul 20 2007, 05:17 PM
kimmytree   But what happens when two people are sharing an ac...   Jul 20 2007, 05:22 PM
digitalfragrance   ^ Then the people that do that take that risk, I g...   Jul 20 2007, 05:22 PM
Tamacracker   QUOTE(shotgunFUNERAL @ Jul 20 2007, 06:17...   Jul 20 2007, 05:25 PM
SayBloodyMary   QUOTE(Tamacracker @ Jul 20 2007, 11:25 PM...   Jul 20 2007, 05:37 PM
Rachel   QUOTE(Tamacracker @ Jul 20 2007, 03:25 PM...   Jul 20 2007, 05:38 PM
Elba   As for the group account, moderators can figure ou...   Jul 20 2007, 05:26 PM
digitalfragrance   QUOTE(Elba @ Jul 20 2007, 06:26 PM) As fo...   Jul 20 2007, 05:37 PM
Elba   Is there a way to ban a specific ip address from a...   Jul 20 2007, 05:44 PM
SayBloodyMary   ^ That I genuinely do not know, but I'll try a...   Jul 20 2007, 05:45 PM
ersatz   No, there's not. We can only ban an IP from th...   Jul 20 2007, 05:50 PM
superstitious   QUOTE(ersatz @ Jul 20 2007, 06:50 PM) No,...   Jul 20 2007, 06:13 PM
Elba   Well the rule for sharing accounts sure makes it s...   Jul 20 2007, 05:57 PM
Elba   It's not really more problematic, you guys are...   Jul 20 2007, 06:15 PM
superstitious   I think that you are misunderstanding. It's p...   Jul 20 2007, 06:19 PM
SayBloodyMary   Well, if it genuinely didn't cause us any pote...   Jul 20 2007, 06:21 PM
Elba   How hard is it to look at the IP address of the po...   Jul 20 2007, 06:21 PM
superstitious   It's not hard. But we shouldn't have to m...   Jul 20 2007, 06:24 PM
Elba   Jesus Christ. Monitor an account? Why would you ha...   Jul 20 2007, 06:26 PM
ersatz   QUOTE(Elba @ Jul 20 2007, 06:26 PM) Jesus...   Jul 22 2007, 01:01 PM
superstitious   *sigh* I said earlier worse possible scenario. :...   Jul 20 2007, 06:27 PM
SayBloodyMary   ^ Well, the first thing I saw you do was bash. And...   Jul 20 2007, 06:28 PM
shotgunFUNERAL   QUOTE(SayBloodyMary @ Jul 20 2007, 06:28 ...   Jul 21 2007, 02:28 PM
Elba   Yeah, but that wasn't the first thing I did   Jul 20 2007, 06:29 PM
Elba   Because he's a moderator now, duhhh   Jul 21 2007, 02:38 PM
steve330   I don't see what the big deal is. If people w...   Jul 21 2007, 02:43 PM
shotgunFUNERAL   jusun saw the potential in it, but then i'm su...   Jul 21 2007, 02:51 PM
superstitious   I actually was considering it, until your cohort d...   Jul 21 2007, 03:01 PM
shotgunFUNERAL   QUOTE(superstitious @ Jul 21 2007, 03:01 ...   Jul 21 2007, 03:13 PM
SayBloodyMary   Spencer, the rule already existed before I used Ni...   Jul 22 2007, 05:04 AM


Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: