cB, Lenient or Strict? Options

[*steve330*]

Just came up out of curiosity. If you could have behavior changed in cB, would you want it to be stricter enforcement regarding bashing/fun(imo), or have it be more lenient. I'd post w/e but that might sugar coat the choices :)

Or would you rather it stay the same?

edit: Don't have to post your opinion either, anonymity ftw :)


My view of strict/lenient.

Strict : Crack down more on member bashing, keeping threads more to the point and less off topic.

Lenient : Allow deviation from the topic as long as it doesn't completely abandon the topic or resort to people fighting and only fighting with no regard to the topic. Allow people to voice their opinion (no matter how rude or mean).

Also, feel free to post your view on leniency/strictness.

[synapse]

Stricter, sorry I just wanted to post =)

If everyone knows the rules, and follows them. There can still be fun in the forums. The member bashing can commence in people's profiles. Or PMs, or not occur at all. But I think that if cB members were to follow the rules more often instead of just wanting to spam to have fun that's really no reason. Do you think there is no way to have fun without it being boring? I think that Kaycee shows a good example how you can follow the rules and still have fun on the forums. There's really no reason why you should member bash people just to have fun.

The topic title should be changed to: "Would you rather have cB Lenient or Strict?"

If people want a way to "voice their opinion (no matter how rude or mean)." Maybe we should create a "Non-anonymous Shoutouts" topic

[moninja]

If people want a way to "voice their opinion (no matter how rude or mean)." Maybe we should create a "Non-anonymous Shoutouts" topic

that just leads to bashing, and stuff...

i don't know.