cB, Lenient or Strict? |
cB, Lenient or Strict? |
*steve330* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
Just came up out of curiosity. If you could have behavior changed in cB, would you want it to be stricter enforcement regarding bashing/fun(imo), or have it be more lenient. I'd post w/e but that might sugar coat the choices :)
Or would you rather it stay the same? edit: Don't have to post your opinion either, anonymity ftw :) My view of strict/lenient. Strict : Crack down more on member bashing, keeping threads more to the point and less off topic. Lenient : Allow deviation from the topic as long as it doesn't completely abandon the topic or resort to people fighting and only fighting with no regard to the topic. Allow people to voice their opinion (no matter how rude or mean). Also, feel free to post your view on leniency/strictness. |
|
|
![]() |
*steve330* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
Yeah but the more exposure to the room you have, the more used to it you get, the more welcome you are. I was so awkward feeling my first time there, but now I come and people practically worship me I'm so clever and just that damn cool ;)
In all seriousness, it's kind of like cB. The people who are here, more active, more known, have a larger reputation, get listened to more than new members. It's not that people do it on purpose, just how things happen. Usually when I go to the CBC it's the same people, like Tina, she's always there. But even you can see the problem if the the community forums were treated to the equivalent of CBC. By no means am I suggesting that it should be as anarchic as CBC :) Also CBC has dull moments, and fun moments. When there are a bunch of people, it tends to move much quicker and is more fun/passes time when you're bored :) CBC > SANDBOX :D But that's just imho. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |