lord of the rings or harry potter, what do you prefer |
lord of the rings or harry potter, what do you prefer |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() The Ghostly Fox Spirit ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 115 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 20,962 ![]() |
So, I've been hearing a lot of things lately on how harry potter is a spin off of lord of the rings, how which one is better than the other....blah blah blah. I just wanna know what other's opinions are on this topic. I'll try and not triple post on this one.
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
LOTR,
well, actually it was written by the writer's response to ww(i'm not sure which one) but i think one. look at the collelations. tolkien was pulled from his life in the english countryside to war across europe. probably WWI, because of the arival of the elephants ( tanks.). i think the colleration ends here, but you can see how it was based off of having to leave the comforts of home for an adventure. lord of the rings is the best classic... and i applause peter jackson for making it come to life. he cast all the charaters great, and the filming is exquisite. lord of the rings is the book come to life. harry potter is just a spinoff of the book. they didn't put that much detail into it. what really sucks it their efforts to make it shorter and PG. it takes out all the fun stuff. and the changing directors, not good. the should also have waited till the 7th one came out and filmed it all at once. it would still take long and the actors would grow, but this is terrrible. LOTR, all the way. they have a cool shiny ring, and what does harry potter have? an invisiblility cloak. did i mention the shiny ring is indestrucable? what happens when harry tears his cloak? |
|
|
![]() ![]() |