Which is better?, All or nothing? |
Which is better?, All or nothing? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 88 Joined: Jun 2007 Member No: 534,037 ![]() |
All right, I've been thinking about it for a while and I wanted to get your oppinions.Which do you think is better in a relationship with a boyfriend/girlfriendd: 1)Having almost nothing in common or 2)Having pretty much everything in common.
1)If you don't have a lot in common, you might lose interest in the person, due to lack of having something to talk about, right?But...A lot of times people say "opposites attract".From what I've seen, a lot of times in relationships where the two people don't have a lot in common, the often get the feeling that the other person "completes" them.It's one of those "you're everything I'm not" types of things. 2)If you do have a lot in common with the person, you'll almost always have something to talk about that interests both of you, correct?But, I mean, you could get bored.Like...Talking to someone who's almost exactly like you would get old eventually, wouldn't it? So, what you you all think? |
|
|
![]() |
*JoanOfArc* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
I think its better if you have a little bit of both. Its bad if you have too much or too little in common. You need a jist of both for the balance. If you have nothing in common, you never get bored. If you have a lot in common, you bond more. Depends what you want in a relationship.
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |