Which is better?, All or nothing? Options

[XRosesXAreXBlack...]

All right, I've been thinking about it for a while and I wanted to get your oppinions.Which do you think is better in a relationship with a boyfriend/girlfriendd: 1)Having almost nothing in common or 2)Having pretty much everything in common.

1)If you don't have a lot in common, you might lose interest in the person, due to lack of having something to talk about, right?But...A lot of times people say "opposites attract".From what I've seen, a lot of times in relationships where the two people don't have a lot in common, the often get the feeling that the other person "completes" them.It's one of those "you're everything I'm not" types of things.

2)If you do have a lot in common with the person, you'll almost always have something to talk about that interests both of you, correct?But, I mean, you could get bored.Like...Talking to someone who's almost exactly like you would get old eventually, wouldn't it?

So, what you you all think?

[sweetest-emotion]

yeah with either you just need to work at the relationship and it will work! i've had bfs who, now that i think about it, we weren't total opposites, but i haven't met a guy who i'm totally alike with. i like that actually. you learn about new things and about each other. then again you do need stuff to click on. so it doesn't matter if you have common interests and such, as long as you click and are easy going with one another (like the convos aren't forced or silent). really any relationship can work as long as both sides work at it.