Which is better?, All or nothing? Options

[XRosesXAreXBlack...]

All right, I've been thinking about it for a while and I wanted to get your oppinions.Which do you think is better in a relationship with a boyfriend/girlfriendd: 1)Having almost nothing in common or 2)Having pretty much everything in common.

1)If you don't have a lot in common, you might lose interest in the person, due to lack of having something to talk about, right?But...A lot of times people say "opposites attract".From what I've seen, a lot of times in relationships where the two people don't have a lot in common, the often get the feeling that the other person "completes" them.It's one of those "you're everything I'm not" types of things.

2)If you do have a lot in common with the person, you'll almost always have something to talk about that interests both of you, correct?But, I mean, you could get bored.Like...Talking to someone who's almost exactly like you would get old eventually, wouldn't it?

So, what you you all think?

[31miracles]

Both, I believe you can make love work no matter how similar or differnet two people are.

but if I had to pick, I'd choose nothing (different). Nothing does not have to mean opposite. I like my girls to be different and individualistic. It's more interesting, because I would have "one of a kind. But I've also had a relationship with someone similar to me, and that worked out too.