Graphics, gone to hell? |
Graphics, gone to hell? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,025 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,051 ![]() |
Sorry if I sound like a broken record but what is happening to the graphics? The quality is decreasing and it looks like some of the mods (not saying any names) aren't reading the submission rules or guidelines. Just looking through the first two pages I can see four of five graphics that are either poor quality or go against the rules. Wasn't the whole point of having a queue to weed out the bad graphics?
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Quand j'étais jeune... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 6,826 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 1,272 ![]() |
No punishment needed.
How about a panel of judges. Maybe an automated system of anonymous staff "yay's/nay's" of a graphic. If two out of three says it's bad, then it's bad and should be rejected. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Kimberly ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,961 Joined: Apr 2005 Member No: 121,599 ![]() |
No punishment needed. How about a panel of judges. Maybe an automated system of anonymous staff "yay's/nay's" of a graphic. If two out of three says it's bad, then it's bad and should be rejected. Maybe we could have a graphics/layout staff that would be in charge of accepting/rejecting things? Not that any of the other staff members aren't capable of doing it, but that way they could stick to modding the forums. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |