Graphics, gone to hell? |
Graphics, gone to hell? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,025 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,051 ![]() |
Sorry if I sound like a broken record but what is happening to the graphics? The quality is decreasing and it looks like some of the mods (not saying any names) aren't reading the submission rules or guidelines. Just looking through the first two pages I can see four of five graphics that are either poor quality or go against the rules. Wasn't the whole point of having a queue to weed out the bad graphics?
|
|
|
![]() |
*Intercourse.* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
^nah I think they just ask you if you had to write a rejection letter say for this one thing what would you say?
I think it would be better to just give them about 5 graphics and ask them which ones need to be accepted or rejected and then ones that need to be rejected write a letter for. It would show what their standards were. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Pocketful of Sunshine ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 8,690 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 289,004 ![]() |
Were you referring to the interviews or the current mods? Because I'm a bit confused..
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |