Graphics, gone to hell? |
Graphics, gone to hell? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,025 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,051 ![]() |
Sorry if I sound like a broken record but what is happening to the graphics? The quality is decreasing and it looks like some of the mods (not saying any names) aren't reading the submission rules or guidelines. Just looking through the first two pages I can see four of five graphics that are either poor quality or go against the rules. Wasn't the whole point of having a queue to weed out the bad graphics?
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Quand j'étais jeune... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 6,826 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 1,272 ![]() |
That sounds complicated. I think only staff should have voting power since there were put into that position, and three should be the maximum. Also, if two staff (out of three) think the graphic is good, then it should be good. Right? 10 is... wow.
You know, many companies train their employees into the position that they were hired for. So, if a staff isn't doing well in judging which is a good graphic... Counsel... whatever. If that doesn't work... the hiring process should be adjusted to look for those who can recognize good/poor graphics. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |