Graphics, gone to hell? |
Graphics, gone to hell? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,025 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,051 ![]() |
Sorry if I sound like a broken record but what is happening to the graphics? The quality is decreasing and it looks like some of the mods (not saying any names) aren't reading the submission rules or guidelines. Just looking through the first two pages I can see four of five graphics that are either poor quality or go against the rules. Wasn't the whole point of having a queue to weed out the bad graphics?
|
|
|
![]() |
*Intercourse.* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
^thats kind of like the idea Jusun had a while back but it just seemed to much trouble to do. It was something like you had these points and you could see all the stuff that needed to be rejected or accepted and everyone that had these points could vote of the thing. Once the item had 10 votes for being accepted it would automatically be accepted. Although with one negative it would be automatically rejected. Also the staff still had all the power to accept and reject graphics as well.
And of course I don't think any punishment should be due. A lot of people just don't look over the rules but of course the staff should look over the rules and perhaps leave a tab open of the rules so they can look back and see if it is up to the rules standards and requirements. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |