Graphics, gone to hell? |
Graphics, gone to hell? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,025 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,051 ![]() |
Sorry if I sound like a broken record but what is happening to the graphics? The quality is decreasing and it looks like some of the mods (not saying any names) aren't reading the submission rules or guidelines. Just looking through the first two pages I can see four of five graphics that are either poor quality or go against the rules. Wasn't the whole point of having a queue to weed out the bad graphics?
|
|
|
![]() |
*Duchess of Dork* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
Demotion does seem harsh, at first glance. However, if a moderator continues to accept substandard work, then it could very well be a last resort. It's important that all of us are held accountable. However, like Kiera said, those in a position to review/accept/reject in the queue should communicate when they have a question about a specific graphic. It never hurts to ask for another eye if you think that for some reason your eye is off, or because the subject matter which the graphic or layout is based on is something you particularly appreciate or enjoy that would affect objectivity.
We very much care about what the Community and visitors utilizing resources here think. This isn't AT ALL meant to replace the feedback here, but Dee posted a thread in the Designers' Cafe regarding specific standards you (collective "you" in the Community) have. I'm really interested in what people say there. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |