makeup |
 May 2 2007, 05:22 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Member  Group: Member Posts: 10 Joined: Mar 2006 Member No: 385,250  |
so yeah, i was wondering what's better coverage wise .. liquid foundation or the mineral stuff? 'cause i've been debating whether if i should switch to mineral 'cause the liquid stuff doesn't seem to work very well, and those infomercials about bare minerals and the other mineral brands seem to be promising. so i just wanted to get your opinion on it.
thanks. :) |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
|
May 2 2007, 11:29 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 durian Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 13,124 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 3,860 |
Skin type does play a key role, but I DEFINITELY prefer the mineral powder. I've worn both, but I noticed that with liquid foundation, my pores got a little bit clogged. I broke up more.
Mineral makeup is supposed to help or skin, as I have been told. It actually helped my skin and provided enough coverage. :P But it is true about your skin type because if your face is oily, I would suggest mineral powder because liquid foundation could cause breakouts. Certain parts of my face was oily and I did get some pimples there -- NASTY ONES!  Nowadays, the only makeup I wear is some eyeshadow, if I'm not lazy. I don't know if liquid foundation would still give me the same problems anymore, since I hardly break out anymore. 
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
ox_adorkable makeup May 2 2007, 05:22 PM
mishyerr It really depends on your skintype.
To elaborate ... May 2 2007, 07:02 PM
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: